Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New character: Avenger (I admit I have doubts...)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Doctor Proctor" data-source="post: 5179443" data-attributes="member: 78547"><p>Simple. Being "good" at a lot of stuff doesn't mean you're the "best" at all those things. Let's take a look, shall we?</p><p></p><p>High AC: Sure, you can get AC equivalent to Plate Heavy Shield with two feats. A Paladin can have that out of the box with zero feats, and a Fighter only needs the single Plate Armor Proficiency feat. Additionally, the Fighter and the Paladin have access to more armor enchantments, as well as armor specialization feats that <em>further</em> increase their AC beyond what the Avenger can get. And on top of that, at least as far as the Fighter is concerned, they have access to things like stances, powers and paragon path/epic destiny abilities that can send it even higher either permanently, or on a temporary basis.</p><p></p><p>High HP: Yes, in terms of base HP the Avenger is 1 HP behind the Fighter, and they get the same amount per level. In theory, they have "Defender level HP". In practice though, things are different. If you're going DEX/WIS, then your CON will be low. This means that your starting HP is lower, and you have fewer surges (when you're already down 2 to start with). Plus, Wardens have both a higher starting HP value in addition to getting more HP per level...and they have a CON based build, which makes the disparity even higher.</p><p></p><p>High Skills: While the Avenger might be stealthy, even a Dragon Magic Sorcerer with no skill training in Athletic will almost undoubtedly have a higher Athletics...even if the Avenger takes skill training <em>and</em> skill focus (with both it would be close when it comes up to Epic). Any STR-based class will easily outpace an Avenger in that skill once you factor in training/focus and/or backgrounds. So, while they would be rivalling the Clerics of the world in terms of perception, they aren't great at <em>every</em> skill in the game...just some of the more useful ones.</p><p></p><p>Then there's other things like ally buffs, controller effects, action denial, marking mechanics, damage output and a whole host of other factors that other specialists are much better at. The Avenger is well rounded, but he doesn't obsolete the rest of the party in any way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Doctor Proctor, post: 5179443, member: 78547"] Simple. Being "good" at a lot of stuff doesn't mean you're the "best" at all those things. Let's take a look, shall we? High AC: Sure, you can get AC equivalent to Plate Heavy Shield with two feats. A Paladin can have that out of the box with zero feats, and a Fighter only needs the single Plate Armor Proficiency feat. Additionally, the Fighter and the Paladin have access to more armor enchantments, as well as armor specialization feats that [I]further[/I] increase their AC beyond what the Avenger can get. And on top of that, at least as far as the Fighter is concerned, they have access to things like stances, powers and paragon path/epic destiny abilities that can send it even higher either permanently, or on a temporary basis. High HP: Yes, in terms of base HP the Avenger is 1 HP behind the Fighter, and they get the same amount per level. In theory, they have "Defender level HP". In practice though, things are different. If you're going DEX/WIS, then your CON will be low. This means that your starting HP is lower, and you have fewer surges (when you're already down 2 to start with). Plus, Wardens have both a higher starting HP value in addition to getting more HP per level...and they have a CON based build, which makes the disparity even higher. High Skills: While the Avenger might be stealthy, even a Dragon Magic Sorcerer with no skill training in Athletic will almost undoubtedly have a higher Athletics...even if the Avenger takes skill training [I]and[/I] skill focus (with both it would be close when it comes up to Epic). Any STR-based class will easily outpace an Avenger in that skill once you factor in training/focus and/or backgrounds. So, while they would be rivalling the Clerics of the world in terms of perception, they aren't great at [I]every[/I] skill in the game...just some of the more useful ones. Then there's other things like ally buffs, controller effects, action denial, marking mechanics, damage output and a whole host of other factors that other specialists are much better at. The Avenger is well rounded, but he doesn't obsolete the rest of the party in any way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New character: Avenger (I admit I have doubts...)
Top