Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New Character Builder from WotC!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sunseeker" data-source="post: 5376414"><p>Sure, you can choose whatever game you want. What I dislike is that when you, or someone, decides to play that game, that you somehow think this makes you entitled to special treatment from the company. Maybe you don't have this, but it sounded like the poster I quoted did.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's what this entire debate is revolving around. Who is entitled to what. Is WotC entitled to make a profit? Is a player entitled to keep their costs down? Should a player be entitled to get free gaming supplies, should a player be entitled to the expectation that the game will NEVER change?</p><p></p><p>These are the points and opinions that have been put forth across this entire thread, who is entitled to what. And many people have put forth the opinion that they, after purchasing one book, are now somehow entitled to everything WotC will ever produce for little to no cost. </p><p></p><p>These are the same sentiments that people who buy computers, TVs, cars, and just about everything else have. It's not really their fault for having an undue sense of entitlement because the companies press this feeling so that customers become dependent on them, even if they're ungrateful. It is however everyone's responsibility to understand that they are entitled to absolutely nothing.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Is suggesting that WotC should be inexensive or downright free constructive? How does that benefit anyone. We may not like WotC, but the game WILL die if they don't make money off of it. Sure, some people still play 1e, but how many? A fraction of a fraction of a niche within the hobby. </p><p></p><p></p><p>And you can STILL do that. </p><p></p><p></p><p>You don't NEED the errata to play. Many games just ignore it and run without it. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Games like D&D have always been a subscription model, no matter how we want to look it. Go your PHB? Good, now get your MM. Got you PHB and MM? Now get your DMG. Got those? Now get their sequals. D&D survives by a constant stream of books. You take how much you've spent on books, divide it up into $10 chunks, and you'll probably find the cost is pretty much the same as if you had subscribed to DDI since you first started buying.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Your original post seemed to indicate that you felt that since you had purchased some books, you were entitled to access the rest at low or no cost. That is a sense of entitlement, that you should be supported, or are somehow special, just because you've bought a few items.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sunseeker, post: 5376414"] Sure, you can choose whatever game you want. What I dislike is that when you, or someone, decides to play that game, that you somehow think this makes you entitled to special treatment from the company. Maybe you don't have this, but it sounded like the poster I quoted did. That's what this entire debate is revolving around. Who is entitled to what. Is WotC entitled to make a profit? Is a player entitled to keep their costs down? Should a player be entitled to get free gaming supplies, should a player be entitled to the expectation that the game will NEVER change? These are the points and opinions that have been put forth across this entire thread, who is entitled to what. And many people have put forth the opinion that they, after purchasing one book, are now somehow entitled to everything WotC will ever produce for little to no cost. These are the same sentiments that people who buy computers, TVs, cars, and just about everything else have. It's not really their fault for having an undue sense of entitlement because the companies press this feeling so that customers become dependent on them, even if they're ungrateful. It is however everyone's responsibility to understand that they are entitled to absolutely nothing. Is suggesting that WotC should be inexensive or downright free constructive? How does that benefit anyone. We may not like WotC, but the game WILL die if they don't make money off of it. Sure, some people still play 1e, but how many? A fraction of a fraction of a niche within the hobby. And you can STILL do that. You don't NEED the errata to play. Many games just ignore it and run without it. Games like D&D have always been a subscription model, no matter how we want to look it. Go your PHB? Good, now get your MM. Got you PHB and MM? Now get your DMG. Got those? Now get their sequals. D&D survives by a constant stream of books. You take how much you've spent on books, divide it up into $10 chunks, and you'll probably find the cost is pretty much the same as if you had subscribed to DDI since you first started buying. Your original post seemed to indicate that you felt that since you had purchased some books, you were entitled to access the rest at low or no cost. That is a sense of entitlement, that you should be supported, or are somehow special, just because you've bought a few items. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New Character Builder from WotC!
Top