Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New Class and Race?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WalterKovacs" data-source="post: 5069710" data-attributes="member: 63763"><p>Comparing defenders:</p><p> </p><p>Fighter - Attack to mark, OA stops target movement, interupt attacks or shifting with MBA</p><p> </p><p>Warden - Be adjacent to mark, interupt attacks with comparable to MBA vs. Fort that also gives C/A, can also react to attack at a distance (no damage)</p><p> </p><p>Paladin - Minor to mark (a single target) at a distance with maintenance required to keep it up plus Divine Sanction, auto damage when mark is broken at any range</p><p> </p><p>Swordmage - Minor to mark (a single target, more with feats) at a distance without maintenance, immediate action at a distance (10 squares) which requires the target hit, then either reduces damage, teleports the target and gives C/A or teleports the swordmage and allows an MBA.</p><p> </p><p>Battlemind - Minor to mark (a single target, enhanceable with a power point) at a distance (maintenance?), opportunity action to follow shifter, reaction to a hit which deals auto damage.</p><p> </p><p>The fighter is able to mark multiple targets if he can attack multiple targets, a warden can mark multiple targets by being adjacent to a number. The paladin needs to use divine sanctions to get extra marks up. The swordmage has the paragon and epic tier feats to get more marks at once (in addition to some powers). The Battlemind similarly is able to mark about as well as the close burst markers, getting only one in the "normal" mark burst. Unlike the swordmage or the paladin they have to be adjacent to get to do anything (that we know of, there may be another build option).</p><p> </p><p>So, they mark like a swordmage, they have to be adjacent to the target like a fighter, they deal auto damage like a paladin (but it needs to hit like a swordmage), etc. The auto damage is great because (a) it only occurs on a hit and (b) it's after the ally is hit. So, obviously it should be better than the paladin's auto damage. The fighter (and warden) get to attack either way, so they still require a hit, but it's their hit that matters (which probably won't suffer from a mark penalty) and they determine the damage as well ... there is also the benefit of potentially killing the foe before it finishes the attack. Alternatively, the swordmage's most easily comparable power (aegis of assault) requires a second hit in order to deal damage. To balance this, a swordmage can be as far as 10 squares away when this happens, and be brought to the scene immediately.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WalterKovacs, post: 5069710, member: 63763"] Comparing defenders: Fighter - Attack to mark, OA stops target movement, interupt attacks or shifting with MBA Warden - Be adjacent to mark, interupt attacks with comparable to MBA vs. Fort that also gives C/A, can also react to attack at a distance (no damage) Paladin - Minor to mark (a single target) at a distance with maintenance required to keep it up plus Divine Sanction, auto damage when mark is broken at any range Swordmage - Minor to mark (a single target, more with feats) at a distance without maintenance, immediate action at a distance (10 squares) which requires the target hit, then either reduces damage, teleports the target and gives C/A or teleports the swordmage and allows an MBA. Battlemind - Minor to mark (a single target, enhanceable with a power point) at a distance (maintenance?), opportunity action to follow shifter, reaction to a hit which deals auto damage. The fighter is able to mark multiple targets if he can attack multiple targets, a warden can mark multiple targets by being adjacent to a number. The paladin needs to use divine sanctions to get extra marks up. The swordmage has the paragon and epic tier feats to get more marks at once (in addition to some powers). The Battlemind similarly is able to mark about as well as the close burst markers, getting only one in the "normal" mark burst. Unlike the swordmage or the paladin they have to be adjacent to get to do anything (that we know of, there may be another build option). So, they mark like a swordmage, they have to be adjacent to the target like a fighter, they deal auto damage like a paladin (but it needs to hit like a swordmage), etc. The auto damage is great because (a) it only occurs on a hit and (b) it's after the ally is hit. So, obviously it should be better than the paladin's auto damage. The fighter (and warden) get to attack either way, so they still require a hit, but it's their hit that matters (which probably won't suffer from a mark penalty) and they determine the damage as well ... there is also the benefit of potentially killing the foe before it finishes the attack. Alternatively, the swordmage's most easily comparable power (aegis of assault) requires a second hit in order to deal damage. To balance this, a swordmage can be as far as 10 squares away when this happens, and be brought to the scene immediately. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New Class and Race?
Top