Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New class concepts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 7400897" data-attributes="member: 996"><p>Unfortunately that problem is, itself, their chosen solution to the problem of making the game inaccessible to new players due to bloat* or shelf-shock. To put it another way, if 'optional' additions to the game are to remain truly optional, then they shouldn't be assumed in any future products.</p><p></p><p> That's just how it had to be, based on the fighter's designs in those editions. The 5e fighter design is similar, it's locked into specific functions within a party, a specific (im)balance across the pillars, and 'martial' ability, in general, is modeled in comparatively inflexible ways that don't lend themselves to adding options without adding sub-classes with new mechanics, if not whole new classes.</p><p></p><p> Sorry to be a quibbler, but monster design moved /back/ away from PC design in 4e - really, only in 3.x/PF/d20 did the game move towards unifying PC and monster design.</p><p></p><p> Because it could use 'monster' mechanics and make no more than oblique cosmetic & mechanical references to the SCAG bladesinger.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>[sblock="* If you're sick of me going on about 'list based' systems, don't click"]Bloat is a very real danger for games like 5e that add new options to cover new concepts by adding to long lists of different, sometimes only subtly different, mechanics & sub-systems (like sub-classes, classes, spells, magic items, skills, weapons, monsters, etc). The more you add options to such a 'list based' game, the more those options can cross-pollenate and synergize in unintended ways that can have corrosive effects on the quality of the overall system. 5e's defense against this is both a very slow pace of release, so options accumulate only very slowly, and the policy of presenting said options, and prettymuch just forgetting about them, never again factoring them into future adventures or designs, so that anyone not opting into them isn't impacted.</p><p></p><p>(The alternative to 'list based' being 'effects based' in which new mechanics are only introduce to enable new results (effects) to be obtained, so new concepts can be added by re-arranging and re-skinning existing mechanics rather than adding new ones. Hero System is the poster boy for effects-based, D&D has rarely strayed in that direction, 5e quite pointedly eschews it.) [/sblock]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 7400897, member: 996"] Unfortunately that problem is, itself, their chosen solution to the problem of making the game inaccessible to new players due to bloat* or shelf-shock. To put it another way, if 'optional' additions to the game are to remain truly optional, then they shouldn't be assumed in any future products. That's just how it had to be, based on the fighter's designs in those editions. The 5e fighter design is similar, it's locked into specific functions within a party, a specific (im)balance across the pillars, and 'martial' ability, in general, is modeled in comparatively inflexible ways that don't lend themselves to adding options without adding sub-classes with new mechanics, if not whole new classes. Sorry to be a quibbler, but monster design moved /back/ away from PC design in 4e - really, only in 3.x/PF/d20 did the game move towards unifying PC and monster design. Because it could use 'monster' mechanics and make no more than oblique cosmetic & mechanical references to the SCAG bladesinger. [sblock="* If you're sick of me going on about 'list based' systems, don't click"]Bloat is a very real danger for games like 5e that add new options to cover new concepts by adding to long lists of different, sometimes only subtly different, mechanics & sub-systems (like sub-classes, classes, spells, magic items, skills, weapons, monsters, etc). The more you add options to such a 'list based' game, the more those options can cross-pollenate and synergize in unintended ways that can have corrosive effects on the quality of the overall system. 5e's defense against this is both a very slow pace of release, so options accumulate only very slowly, and the policy of presenting said options, and prettymuch just forgetting about them, never again factoring them into future adventures or designs, so that anyone not opting into them isn't impacted. (The alternative to 'list based' being 'effects based' in which new mechanics are only introduce to enable new results (effects) to be obtained, so new concepts can be added by re-arranging and re-skinning existing mechanics rather than adding new ones. Hero System is the poster boy for effects-based, D&D has rarely strayed in that direction, 5e quite pointedly eschews it.) [/sblock] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New class concepts
Top