Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DND_Reborn" data-source="post: 8094919" data-attributes="member: 6987520">I agree that is probably a key point. Our &quot;adventures&quot; take several days to weeks in game time, so figure a minimum of 5 long rests (rarely) and up to 20+ before the &quot;adventure&quot; is over.While I am not thrilled with the concept of Spell Versatility, I take greater issue with the speed of it (one spell per long rest). Doing it during downtime, or increasing it to one long rest per spell level, or even limiting it to a number of times equal to your spellcasting ability modifier (regain all uses when you level) could work IMO and would be more balanced.And yes, I never concern myself with balance during an adventuring day. There is so much variability in an adventuring day, some classes will shine on some days, others on others.My issue with just giving wizards more spells (especially if they do have to pay for them) is that it is DM fiat, as where if Spell Versatility was a rule it carries a bit more weight. Of course a DM is free to ignore it, but if such a feature made its way into 6E, it would rankle some players more IMO.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DND_Reborn, post: 8094919, member: 6987520"] I agree that is probably a key point. Our "adventures" take several days to weeks in game time, so figure a minimum of 5 long rests (rarely) and up to 20+ before the "adventure" is over. While I am not thrilled with the concept of Spell Versatility, I take greater issue with the speed of it (one spell per long rest). Doing it during downtime, or increasing it to one long rest per spell level, or even limiting it to a number of times equal to your spellcasting ability modifier (regain all uses when you [I]level[/I]) could work IMO and would be more balanced. And yes, I never concern myself with balance during an adventuring day. There is so much variability in an adventuring day, some classes will shine on some days, others on others. My issue with just giving wizards more spells (especially if they [I]do[/I] have to pay for them) is that it is DM fiat, as where if Spell Versatility was a rule it carries a bit more weight. Of course a DM is free to ignore it, but if such a feature made its way into 6E, it would rankle some players more IMO. [/QUOTE]

Verification