Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Helldritch" data-source="post: 8095853" data-attributes="member: 6855114">You hyperbole yourself by diminishing the impact this &quot;optional&quot; rule will have. This rule does affect versatility in a major way and denying it is simply hiding your head in the sand. Wizard pretty much only have versatility on their side and as I said, just by taking the feat ritual caster you just outdo the wizard. One feat is all it takes now to simply make the wizard obsolete. I have seen so many non sense about just giving more spell to the wizard by putting more scrolls, spell books or whatever on the path of a wizard player that my eyes are almost bleeding. You know that you propose to bypass a rule with.... DM's Fiat!!!!! If these kind of solutions had been offered for any&nbsp; classes but the wizards, we would have seen an uproar of protests going as far as Saturn. You don't correct a bad rule with DM's Fiat... I admit that the sorcerer needs a bit more love and flavor. Adding more sorcery point would have been better option&nbsp; but going the way this rule goes is out of proportions. It is not by destroying the relevance of a class that you correct the problematic of an other class that is caused exactly by... DM's Fiat in the first place.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Helldritch, post: 8095853, member: 6855114"] You hyperbole yourself by diminishing the impact this "optional" rule will have. This rule does affect versatility in a major way and denying it is simply hiding your head in the sand. Wizard pretty much only have versatility on their side and as I said, just by taking the feat ritual caster you just outdo the wizard. One feat is all it takes now to simply make the wizard obsolete. I have seen so many non sense about just giving more spell to the wizard by putting more scrolls, spell books or whatever on the path of a wizard player that my eyes are almost bleeding. You know that you propose to bypass a rule with.... DM's Fiat!!!!! If these kind of solutions had been offered for any classes but the wizards, we would have seen an uproar of protests going as far as Saturn. You don't correct a bad rule with DM's Fiat... I admit that the sorcerer needs a bit more love and flavor. Adding more sorcery point would have been better option but going the way this rule goes is out of proportions. It is not by destroying the relevance of a class that you correct the problematic of an other class that is caused exactly by... DM's Fiat in the first place. [/QUOTE]

Verification