Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New Class: The Lancer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Olfactatron" data-source="post: 4378753" data-attributes="member: 18035"><p>Some hopefully constructive crit:</p><p>Blinding Strike is way, way too strong. A burst blind effect versus a non-AC defense is would challenge some of the best 1st and 5th level daily powers. As an encounter power it's far too good. Even if it uses a secondary ability to attack. </p><p></p><p>Rapid strike doesn't need an attack penalty. </p><p></p><p>I don't see a need for defensive spin to do only Str damage. If you feel it's too powerful, drop the bonus to AC and Ref to +1. </p><p></p><p>As a whole I think you should move this class in one direction or the other, as it is it's not enough of a defender or a striker to fulfill either roll effectively. Making it a good 5th man, but incapable of effectively being the prime defender or striker. </p><p></p><p>Giving it threatening reach as a minor action would probably be enough to make it one hell of a defender with no other changes necessary. </p><p></p><p>To make it a good striker, you would have to include some way to increase it's damage per round to a single target (I like some variation of the leaping dragoon ability for this) Also, since the Lancer is pretty much restricted to using +2 prof weapons, his attack bonus is a little low compared to other strikers who get prime shot or an extra prof bonus in the rogue's case. </p><p></p><p>It's a great idea, it only needs a little tweaking to get it to be a great execution as well. Good work.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Olfactatron, post: 4378753, member: 18035"] Some hopefully constructive crit: Blinding Strike is way, way too strong. A burst blind effect versus a non-AC defense is would challenge some of the best 1st and 5th level daily powers. As an encounter power it's far too good. Even if it uses a secondary ability to attack. Rapid strike doesn't need an attack penalty. I don't see a need for defensive spin to do only Str damage. If you feel it's too powerful, drop the bonus to AC and Ref to +1. As a whole I think you should move this class in one direction or the other, as it is it's not enough of a defender or a striker to fulfill either roll effectively. Making it a good 5th man, but incapable of effectively being the prime defender or striker. Giving it threatening reach as a minor action would probably be enough to make it one hell of a defender with no other changes necessary. To make it a good striker, you would have to include some way to increase it's damage per round to a single target (I like some variation of the leaping dragoon ability for this) Also, since the Lancer is pretty much restricted to using +2 prof weapons, his attack bonus is a little low compared to other strikers who get prime shot or an extra prof bonus in the rogue's case. It's a great idea, it only needs a little tweaking to get it to be a great execution as well. Good work. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New Class: The Lancer
Top