Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Irlo" data-source="post: 8522495" data-attributes="member: 7028372">I'm sure I typed hastily, but .... really? I answered the survey question. Whether the game needs more classes depends on the needs of the table. If one doesn't want me to say that the game doesn't need more classes, one shouldn't ask me the question.Every table should tweak the rules and classes and add and delete as they see fit.Yes, I'm glad that there are not officially published options for the assassin's auto-kill and the swordmage class features that are so powerful and different that they can't be allowed to be used by anyone else. It's my opinion. I'm not doing anything to keep you from having them. I don't need them. I won't boycott WotC if they publish them.I'm glad they're not published options because they outshine other existing class options (insert all the caveats -- as I understand them, in my opinion, based on my experience, taken out of context, etc.). I want my players to thumb through the books and find stuff that works that won't leave them far behind or put others far ahead of them in character capability.Nothing that happens at your table makes my game better or worse. Unless you share a cool, balanced class write up for swordmage that I can use, in which case you've made it better. A few years ago one of my players looked online for a homebrew swordmage class to run by me to see if I'd include it. That was a hard no. More powerful than any other published class. I'd love to see something along these lines. Until then, we do fine with the published classes and subclasses.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Irlo, post: 8522495, member: 7028372"] I'm sure I typed hastily, but .... really? I answered the survey question. Whether the game needs more classes depends on the needs of the table. If one doesn't want me to say that the game doesn't need more classes, one shouldn't ask me the question. Every table should tweak the rules and classes and add and delete as they see fit. Yes, I'm glad that there are not officially published options for the assassin's auto-kill and the swordmage class features that are so powerful and different that they can't be allowed to be used by anyone else. It's my opinion. I'm not doing anything to keep you from having them. I don't need them. I won't boycott WotC if they publish them. I'm glad they're not published options because they outshine other existing class options (insert all the caveats -- as I understand them, in my opinion, based on my experience, taken out of context, etc.). I want my players to thumb through the books and find stuff that works that won't leave them far behind or put others far ahead of them in character capability. Nothing that happens at your table makes my game better or worse. Unless you share a cool, balanced class write up for swordmage that I can use, in which case you've made it better. A few years ago one of my players looked online for a homebrew swordmage class to run by me to see if I'd include it. That was a hard no. More powerful than any other published class. I'd love to see something along these lines. Until then, we do fine with the published classes and subclasses. [/QUOTE]

Verification