Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New Core Rulebooks Every Year - A Mistake
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 3780979" data-attributes="member: 48965"><p>You know I was looking over my post and realized I stated part of what I was trying to say in an unclear way. </p><p></p><p>I don't think having multiple books labeled as "core" and as PHB I, PHB 2, etc. will be confusing in the sense that a player won't know which is the first one...I meant more in the way of what exactly is <strong>necessary</strong> to run a game. Many say the structure of D&D 3.5 is daunting with all the splat books, environment books, supplemental extensions, etc. I see a structure where there are numerous PHB's on top of splat books for the different power types for each, as well as campaign sourcebooks, etc. as becoming quickly daunting to someone who tries to get into the game after the first or second year. This seems especially problematic if they don't go to gaming sites on the internet to understand the structure yet everything is labelled core.</p><p></p><p>I see alot of people espousing the sentiment that the multiple PHB's will cut down on splat-books, but I don't see this happening in anyway. If WotC is using the PHB's to premiere new power sources it seems logical that they won't have room to supplement previous power sources in the same book. </p><p></p><p>The inverse would be problematic in that if I only want to play with the power sources in the first PHB then putting the supplemental material for them in a second handbook with four new power sources means I'm paying for at least half a book I won't use. </p><p></p><p>Finally if they choose to go the supplemental material on the DI route, I will be very dissapointed(yes I know this is a personal thing.). I own a Mac and I just can't see paying the full price of a subscription with only limited use of the applications and content I'm paying for. I know nothing is finalized, so hopefully WotC will find a way to address this issue. Though I still would rather buy my supplements as books, that I can browse and make an informed decision about, rather than a subscription sight unseen. YMMV of course.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 3780979, member: 48965"] You know I was looking over my post and realized I stated part of what I was trying to say in an unclear way. I don't think having multiple books labeled as "core" and as PHB I, PHB 2, etc. will be confusing in the sense that a player won't know which is the first one...I meant more in the way of what exactly is [B]necessary[/B] to run a game. Many say the structure of D&D 3.5 is daunting with all the splat books, environment books, supplemental extensions, etc. I see a structure where there are numerous PHB's on top of splat books for the different power types for each, as well as campaign sourcebooks, etc. as becoming quickly daunting to someone who tries to get into the game after the first or second year. This seems especially problematic if they don't go to gaming sites on the internet to understand the structure yet everything is labelled core. I see alot of people espousing the sentiment that the multiple PHB's will cut down on splat-books, but I don't see this happening in anyway. If WotC is using the PHB's to premiere new power sources it seems logical that they won't have room to supplement previous power sources in the same book. The inverse would be problematic in that if I only want to play with the power sources in the first PHB then putting the supplemental material for them in a second handbook with four new power sources means I'm paying for at least half a book I won't use. Finally if they choose to go the supplemental material on the DI route, I will be very dissapointed(yes I know this is a personal thing.). I own a Mac and I just can't see paying the full price of a subscription with only limited use of the applications and content I'm paying for. I know nothing is finalized, so hopefully WotC will find a way to address this issue. Though I still would rather buy my supplements as books, that I can browse and make an informed decision about, rather than a subscription sight unseen. YMMV of course. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New Core Rulebooks Every Year - A Mistake
Top