Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New D&D Hardcover To Be Announced On The 23rd (Tomorrow)?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 8206379" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>I don't see much daylight between that and what I said earlier - you seem to be trying to imply that somehow between the periods we have better evidence for, i.e. the classical era and the middle ages, there was some secret mass persecution, which no-one remembers, there's no evidence of, and which didn't continue into the middle ages. That's a pretty wacky/wild thing to be going with. And to even get there I think rather you interpreted what I said in the most ungenerous way possible.</p><p></p><p>So googling, as you suggest, says you plagiarized from wikipedia - why they heck didn't you just link wikipedia? I thought at least I'd find it was from a book that wasn't online. And that's what quoting from a source, whilst both not linking the source, and not saying it's quote is, by the way - weirdly unnecessary plagiarism. Even if you rephrase it, it's not, but you didn't even do that!</p><p></p><p>What's more, the claims you're linking to on Wikipedia both have <strong>[citation needed]</strong> on them for god's sake! So your "good sources" are nothing of the sort! You have no sources! Good lord! So you literally <em>lied</em> about "good sources" and plagiarized at this point! Mind = blown as they say. I did not expect that. Did you just think I wouldn't check after you told me to google them? As neither claim has any kind of source, It's just junk some dude randomly wrote on wikipedia, and due to to be removed or replaced eventually. I mean, I'm assuming you didn't put them on wikipedia, here, because that seems like hard work for an internet argument with an idiot like me.</p><p></p><p>Here's the actual article btw, which paints a more complex picture (er, despite the hilariously lurid illustration), especially when we ignore the unsourced claims.</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_witchcraft[/URL]</p><p></p><p>You can see how the problem like really only becomes big as we get the idea of the diabolic pact, and it isn't until the end of the middle ages that anti-witch stuff really kicks off big-time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 8206379, member: 18"] I don't see much daylight between that and what I said earlier - you seem to be trying to imply that somehow between the periods we have better evidence for, i.e. the classical era and the middle ages, there was some secret mass persecution, which no-one remembers, there's no evidence of, and which didn't continue into the middle ages. That's a pretty wacky/wild thing to be going with. And to even get there I think rather you interpreted what I said in the most ungenerous way possible. So googling, as you suggest, says you plagiarized from wikipedia - why they heck didn't you just link wikipedia? I thought at least I'd find it was from a book that wasn't online. And that's what quoting from a source, whilst both not linking the source, and not saying it's quote is, by the way - weirdly unnecessary plagiarism. Even if you rephrase it, it's not, but you didn't even do that! What's more, the claims you're linking to on Wikipedia both have [B][citation needed][/B] on them for god's sake! So your "good sources" are nothing of the sort! You have no sources! Good lord! So you literally [I]lied[/I] about "good sources" and plagiarized at this point! Mind = blown as they say. I did not expect that. Did you just think I wouldn't check after you told me to google them? As neither claim has any kind of source, It's just junk some dude randomly wrote on wikipedia, and due to to be removed or replaced eventually. I mean, I'm assuming you didn't put them on wikipedia, here, because that seems like hard work for an internet argument with an idiot like me. Here's the actual article btw, which paints a more complex picture (er, despite the hilariously lurid illustration), especially when we ignore the unsourced claims. [URL unfurl="true"]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_witchcraft[/URL] You can see how the problem like really only becomes big as we get the idea of the diabolic pact, and it isn't until the end of the middle ages that anti-witch stuff really kicks off big-time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New D&D Hardcover To Be Announced On The 23rd (Tomorrow)?
Top