Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
New Dark Sun Info - Free Tyr and the Mountains of Athas
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wik" data-source="post: 5024182" data-attributes="member: 40177"><p>I can give you a few reasons:</p><p></p><p>1) Going to war is problematic. Remember, in the original text, it is assumed the SK's war with each other, but these wars are more like minor skirmishes. To actually go in and INVADE another City-State, even one without an SK, is dangerous. Especially since Tyr is a very large city-state - only Raam is larger. And Tyr is the best-armed state in the region, since they have access to Iron Weapons. Any war against Tyr, even if Tyr is poorly organized, will weaken the army of the invader enough that they could find their own position endangered by the other five SKs.</p><p></p><p>2) The loss of Kalak is a good thing, anyway. One less super defiler means there is more for the ones that remain, and less competition. I imagine no SK looked at Kalak's death and felt it was a huge loss.</p><p></p><p>3) Arrogance. The SK's are the height of power. They see an SK fall, they do not thing "Hey, this could happen to me". They instead arrogantly believe it was because of Kalak's foolishness, and that their own position is much stronger. And, they likewise believe that a city-state NEEDS an SK, and that Tyr will probably implode within a few years or decades. I imagine the goals of all six SKs have some variation of "have agents in Free Tyr, so that when the experiment fails, we can pick up the pieces for personal profit".</p><p></p><p>4) Iron. Tyr supplies the Iron to the region. Without Iron, things fail. You cannot mine other materials. Farming becomes even harder. Eventually, without iron, you cannot enforce your rule upon your subjects. Essentially - disrupt the iron trade for too long, and you lose, even if you win the war.</p><p></p><p>5) Profit. Namely, what's the profit in invading Tyr? Sure, you get the iron, but you're going to cut off access to that iron before you get it (which will make the other five SK's hate you). There are no real economic benefits to Tyr beyond the iron that you don't have at home - it's in a desert, too. And probably a distance away. Athas is not a land of empires - it is a land of city-states, and no one has the means to rule multiple states. It is best to play things from the shadows.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wik, post: 5024182, member: 40177"] I can give you a few reasons: 1) Going to war is problematic. Remember, in the original text, it is assumed the SK's war with each other, but these wars are more like minor skirmishes. To actually go in and INVADE another City-State, even one without an SK, is dangerous. Especially since Tyr is a very large city-state - only Raam is larger. And Tyr is the best-armed state in the region, since they have access to Iron Weapons. Any war against Tyr, even if Tyr is poorly organized, will weaken the army of the invader enough that they could find their own position endangered by the other five SKs. 2) The loss of Kalak is a good thing, anyway. One less super defiler means there is more for the ones that remain, and less competition. I imagine no SK looked at Kalak's death and felt it was a huge loss. 3) Arrogance. The SK's are the height of power. They see an SK fall, they do not thing "Hey, this could happen to me". They instead arrogantly believe it was because of Kalak's foolishness, and that their own position is much stronger. And, they likewise believe that a city-state NEEDS an SK, and that Tyr will probably implode within a few years or decades. I imagine the goals of all six SKs have some variation of "have agents in Free Tyr, so that when the experiment fails, we can pick up the pieces for personal profit". 4) Iron. Tyr supplies the Iron to the region. Without Iron, things fail. You cannot mine other materials. Farming becomes even harder. Eventually, without iron, you cannot enforce your rule upon your subjects. Essentially - disrupt the iron trade for too long, and you lose, even if you win the war. 5) Profit. Namely, what's the profit in invading Tyr? Sure, you get the iron, but you're going to cut off access to that iron before you get it (which will make the other five SK's hate you). There are no real economic benefits to Tyr beyond the iron that you don't have at home - it's in a desert, too. And probably a distance away. Athas is not a land of empires - it is a land of city-states, and no one has the means to rule multiple states. It is best to play things from the shadows. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
New Dark Sun Info - Free Tyr and the Mountains of Athas
Top