Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Xethreau" data-source="post: 3908078" data-attributes="member: 57584">I have a few things to say to various things said in this thread so far:-There is no evidence of Two-Weapon Fighting moving to a class power.  Many classes in 4e art has been seen dual wielding.  Including a <a href="http://wizarduniverse.com/_images_/005672/Tieflingfighter.jpg" target="_blank">tiefling fighter</a>, and the other tiefling on the front of the Races and Classes book.-I am not too happy with the name "Golden Wevern Adept" myself, and since the other names kind of stink too, I think an 'in-between' name like "Spell Sculpting Adept" might be suitable.-I *really* like the idea that Najal speculated, and agree/hope that a system like that is put into place.-I do not think that Golden Wyvern will any more of an organization than the field of Biology is in real life. There may be organizations who study the area, or perhaps even dedicate themselves to it, but I doubt such a thing is necessary to run the world.-As a person who was not introduced to some of the 'classic' flavor of D&D during its prime, I was not much of a fan of some of the systems in place during 3e (including Wizard's schools, rules on planes, etc.), and found myself having to do a lot of reflavoring many many things.  Even though this time around, I am going to build my campaign world roughly arround 'core,' I have little problems with changing fluff to fit my needs, and this is partualy from the practice I got in 3e.  Please keep an open mind, people, when listening to fluff.  [Example] Just because there is a Peylor in core does not mean that that has to be your campaign's sun god.</blockquote>

Verification