Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Malhost Zormaeril" data-source="post: 3780939" data-attributes="member: 49669">...Serpent Eye cabalists......mages of the Iron Sigil......Servants of the Hidden Flame......Golden Wyvern initiates......Emerald Frost adepts......Stormwalker theurges...I certainly hope I'm assuming poorly, because that would mean I have nothing to worry about, but consider the actual words reported by Alaric on post #311 (repeated above).&nbsp; If the Serpent Eye were nothing but a new name for a grouping of spells, shouldn't we see &quot;wizards who draw upon the Serpent Eye&quot; rather than &quot;Serpent Eye cabalists&quot;?The word &quot;initiates&quot; in &quot;Golden Wyvern initiates&quot; has the same kind of problem.&nbsp; I'll admit that the others can be construed in good faith not to be organisations, but it cannot be that some groupings of spells give rise to an organisation while others do not?&nbsp; So yes, I am assuming, but unfortunately I do not have reason to believe it is a poor assumption.EDIT: From the last paragraph of the (new) article:</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Malhost Zormaeril, post: 3780939, member: 49669"] ...Serpent Eye cabalists... ...mages of the Iron Sigil... ...Servants of the Hidden Flame... ...Golden Wyvern initiates... ...Emerald Frost adepts... ...Stormwalker theurges... I certainly hope I'm assuming poorly, because that would mean I have nothing to worry about, but consider the actual words reported by Alaric on post #311 (repeated above). If the Serpent Eye were nothing but a new name for a grouping of spells, shouldn't we see "wizards who draw upon the Serpent Eye" rather than "Serpent Eye cabalists"? The word "initiates" in "Golden Wyvern initiates" has the same kind of problem. I'll admit that the others can be construed in good faith not to be organisations, but it cannot be that [i]some[/i] groupings of spells give rise to an organisation while others do not? So yes, I am assuming, but unfortunately I do not have reason to believe it is a poor assumption. EDIT: From the last paragraph of the (new) article: [/QUOTE]

Verification