Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dormammu" data-source="post: 3972411" data-attributes="member: 28738"><p>I like most of the examples you give, but I can't help but notice they are ALL from 1st edition.  It makes me wonder what is different about the newer stuff.  Do I only like those examples because of nostalgia?  I do think one problem with newer monsters is that I feel like they are forcing too much too fast.  You can't really generate a book full of good monsters every year (well most people can't).  In fact, most of the 1E Monster Manual II was pretty junky when you come down to it.  And Fiend Folio mostly got by on being weird.  No, I think it's a ratio thing.  If 1 in 20 new monsters is good, ditching the old stuff is a bad bet. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>