Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Errata Released For D&D PHB, OotA, Xanathar, and ToF
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="clearstream" data-source="post: 7962386" data-attributes="member: 71699"><p>Seeing as your argument here rests on a contention that monsters that wield weapons do not follow the same rules as PCs, and we are speaking here of matters of RAW, you will need to reference the relevant rules.</p><p></p><p>If you do not, then I will be justified in saying that such RAW does not exist. The original RAW will thus allow tiny creatures to use Heavy weapons and not, as you put it, allow or disallow their use at the same time.</p><p></p><p></p><p>This is quite a different contention. Your first contention was about whether creatures that wield weapons do so under the same rules as PCs. So if an orc picks up a pike, they may or may not have reach. Setting aside a DM's ongoing authority to change any rule, the default by RAW is that an orc with a pike has reach with that pike.</p><p></p><p>Taking your point here to be roughly an assertion of COWTRA (<em>just because the rules haven't disallowed something, doesn't mean that its allowed</em>), then given that the rules say that a pike gives reach, we should suppose that an orc using a pike gains reach. What we should not suppose is that an orc with a pike gains finesse, because the rules don't say that orcs with pikes don't have finesse (even if, as a matter of possibility, they could one day in the unknown future say that they do get finesse).</p><p></p><p>[EDIT: Reflecting on how you construct your idea here, it really is kind of nice. I like the way that you urge us to reflect on a past moment when X did not exist, keeping in mind the present moment when X does exist, and understand that there might have been no need to have rules constraining X back then, before it existed. All I am saying is that it is wrong to say in this case that X did not exist back then, or at least put the burden on you to show some evidence for your claim that it did not.)</p><p></p><p>[EDIT2: I guess this question becomes moot considering that magic can make PCs tiny.]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="clearstream, post: 7962386, member: 71699"] Seeing as your argument here rests on a contention that monsters that wield weapons do not follow the same rules as PCs, and we are speaking here of matters of RAW, you will need to reference the relevant rules. If you do not, then I will be justified in saying that such RAW does not exist. The original RAW will thus allow tiny creatures to use Heavy weapons and not, as you put it, allow or disallow their use at the same time. This is quite a different contention. Your first contention was about whether creatures that wield weapons do so under the same rules as PCs. So if an orc picks up a pike, they may or may not have reach. Setting aside a DM's ongoing authority to change any rule, the default by RAW is that an orc with a pike has reach with that pike. Taking your point here to be roughly an assertion of COWTRA ([I]just because the rules haven't disallowed something, doesn't mean that its allowed[/I]), then given that the rules say that a pike gives reach, we should suppose that an orc using a pike gains reach. What we should not suppose is that an orc with a pike gains finesse, because the rules don't say that orcs with pikes don't have finesse (even if, as a matter of possibility, they could one day in the unknown future say that they do get finesse). [EDIT: Reflecting on how you construct your idea here, it really is kind of nice. I like the way that you urge us to reflect on a past moment when X did not exist, keeping in mind the present moment when X does exist, and understand that there might have been no need to have rules constraining X back then, before it existed. All I am saying is that it is wrong to say in this case that X did not exist back then, or at least put the burden on you to show some evidence for your claim that it did not.) [EDIT2: I guess this question becomes moot considering that magic can make PCs tiny.] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Errata Released For D&D PHB, OotA, Xanathar, and ToF
Top