Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Errata Released For D&D PHB, OotA, Xanathar, and ToF
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="clearstream" data-source="post: 7962461" data-attributes="member: 71699"><p>So with in mind whether errata should change rules, picture the following</p><p></p><p>D&Dm (mirror-world D&D) has creature sizes smue and tue. Smue creatures have the properties that small ones do in D&D <em>except </em>they can use heavy weapons. Tue creatures have the properties that tiny ones do in D&D <em>except</em> they can use heavy weapons. (In D&Dm only mue creatures cannot use heavy weapons.)</p><p></p><p>1) At some time after release, an errata is published to D&Dm saying that tue creatures cannot use heavy weapons. Should the heavy weapon constraint also apply to smue creatures even though they are not specified?</p><p></p><p>2) A bit later, an errata is published to D&Dm saying that the previous errata is erased and smue creatures cannot use heavy weapons. Should the heavy weapon constraint apply to tue creatures even though this errata "erased" the previous one and prior to that they were able to use them?</p><p></p><p>Perhaps by thinking about smue and tue creatures we can see that assuming that anything that constrains the former constrains the latter (probably inconsistently) amounts to a hidden rule. What Bjork and Holopainen would have called an exogenous rule. It is a rule we add to the game aka a house rule.</p><p></p><p>I'm not saying that it is wrong to have exogenous rules. For one thing, it would be impossible to make any sense of RPG rules if we didn't bring into it a whole host of hidden rules. [USER=6749263]@Envisioner[/USER] is right to point out that there are simulationist aspects of D&D that should inform our interpretations. The risk is that as these assumptions are hidden, we don't know for sure that we share the same ones: almost certainly we do not.</p><p></p><p>I am questioning if it is really the job of errata to reify our hidden rules? What if my hidden rule differs from yours? Are we happy to say that all an errata need do is please the majority? Surely "pleasing the majority" underdetermines the job of errata. Perhaps sending us all ice cream would please us more... but sending us ice cream wouldn't be errata? So clearly errata has some job to do, beyond pleasing the majority.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="clearstream, post: 7962461, member: 71699"] So with in mind whether errata should change rules, picture the following D&Dm (mirror-world D&D) has creature sizes smue and tue. Smue creatures have the properties that small ones do in D&D [I]except [/I]they can use heavy weapons. Tue creatures have the properties that tiny ones do in D&D [I]except[/I] they can use heavy weapons. (In D&Dm only mue creatures cannot use heavy weapons.) 1) At some time after release, an errata is published to D&Dm saying that tue creatures cannot use heavy weapons. Should the heavy weapon constraint also apply to smue creatures even though they are not specified? 2) A bit later, an errata is published to D&Dm saying that the previous errata is erased and smue creatures cannot use heavy weapons. Should the heavy weapon constraint apply to tue creatures even though this errata "erased" the previous one and prior to that they were able to use them? Perhaps by thinking about smue and tue creatures we can see that assuming that anything that constrains the former constrains the latter (probably inconsistently) amounts to a hidden rule. What Bjork and Holopainen would have called an exogenous rule. It is a rule we add to the game aka a house rule. I'm not saying that it is wrong to have exogenous rules. For one thing, it would be impossible to make any sense of RPG rules if we didn't bring into it a whole host of hidden rules. [USER=6749263]@Envisioner[/USER] is right to point out that there are simulationist aspects of D&D that should inform our interpretations. The risk is that as these assumptions are hidden, we don't know for sure that we share the same ones: almost certainly we do not. I am questioning if it is really the job of errata to reify our hidden rules? What if my hidden rule differs from yours? Are we happy to say that all an errata need do is please the majority? Surely "pleasing the majority" underdetermines the job of errata. Perhaps sending us all ice cream would please us more... but sending us ice cream wouldn't be errata? So clearly errata has some job to do, beyond pleasing the majority. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Errata Released For D&D PHB, OotA, Xanathar, and ToF
Top