Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Errata Released For D&D PHB, OotA, Xanathar, and ToF
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 7964814" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>I wouldn't actually agree with that.</p><p></p><p>My position is both more and less firm. My issues here stem from WotC's stated position, which is that they would not do 4E-style nerfs/buffs to 5E via errata.</p><p></p><p>That means, very simply one thing for 5E - <strong>errata should only fix typos or gross lack of clarity</strong> (which is essentially an elaborate form of typo). Everything about "intuition" and so on? Nah. That allows all sorts of crazy nonsense.</p><p></p><p>That's for errata.</p><p></p><p>Sage Advice is <em>not errata</em>. It's just Jeremy Crawford's opinion. He's a nice man, he's a smart man. I like Jeremy Crawford. He's also <em>easily</em> the best Sage that Sage Advice has ever had, certainly in the last thirty years (god some of the stuff in 2E was terrible - a lot of it was actually straight-up rules-wrong and even actually opening the PHB/DMG revealed that). But that's a very, very low bar. That's like a 30cm hurdle (12 inches for Americans).</p><p></p><p>I don't mind at all what they say in Sage Advice. I don't even mind that they put it in a PDF. Because neither I nor other DMs playing are "bound" by it, and it's even strongly suggested we follow it (thank goodness). I have no objection to it, even if it occasionally makes me roll my eyes. I do object a bit when Jeremy Crawford says people are "ignoring the rules" when in fact they're merely interpreting them differently to him, but I feel like he's mostly doing so in a playful way so it's not too bad.</p><p></p><p>Unearthed Arcana is also <em>not errata</em>. They can do whatever the heck they like with UA, and you know what? I support them. Strongly. The big "class feature variants" UA was great. If they put that in a book, or even an official PDF, and it becomes official, great. And groups can <em>choose</em> to use it or not because that's how content works in 5E. It's no more an "errata" than Xanathar's is an "errata", or Eberron is an "errata".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 7964814, member: 18"] I wouldn't actually agree with that. My position is both more and less firm. My issues here stem from WotC's stated position, which is that they would not do 4E-style nerfs/buffs to 5E via errata. That means, very simply one thing for 5E - [B]errata should only fix typos or gross lack of clarity[/B] (which is essentially an elaborate form of typo). Everything about "intuition" and so on? Nah. That allows all sorts of crazy nonsense. That's for errata. Sage Advice is [I]not errata[/I]. It's just Jeremy Crawford's opinion. He's a nice man, he's a smart man. I like Jeremy Crawford. He's also [I]easily[/I] the best Sage that Sage Advice has ever had, certainly in the last thirty years (god some of the stuff in 2E was terrible - a lot of it was actually straight-up rules-wrong and even actually opening the PHB/DMG revealed that). But that's a very, very low bar. That's like a 30cm hurdle (12 inches for Americans). I don't mind at all what they say in Sage Advice. I don't even mind that they put it in a PDF. Because neither I nor other DMs playing are "bound" by it, and it's even strongly suggested we follow it (thank goodness). I have no objection to it, even if it occasionally makes me roll my eyes. I do object a bit when Jeremy Crawford says people are "ignoring the rules" when in fact they're merely interpreting them differently to him, but I feel like he's mostly doing so in a playful way so it's not too bad. Unearthed Arcana is also [I]not errata[/I]. They can do whatever the heck they like with UA, and you know what? I support them. Strongly. The big "class feature variants" UA was great. If they put that in a book, or even an official PDF, and it becomes official, great. And groups can [I]choose[/I] to use it or not because that's how content works in 5E. It's no more an "errata" than Xanathar's is an "errata", or Eberron is an "errata". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Errata Released For D&D PHB, OotA, Xanathar, and ToF
Top