Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New Essentials Builds!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 5331385" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>Except the problem is the EXISTENCE of so many redundant but mechanically VERY slightly different options. I don't have a problem with what Essentials IS, I have a problem that it is AT ALL. The other night one of my players expressed a desire to play a fighter. Now this player is not super rules savvy and I'm not even sure owns any 4e books at all outside of a PHB1 and a DDI subscription. Right now this instant she can go into CB and already will see a substantial number of options, 5 builds of Fighter, 3 builds of Barbarian, at least 3 of Warden, all of which could be interesting. Why does she need at least 2 MORE subclasses of Fighter that will soon pop up in her CB? What character can you build with these that you couldn't build before? What advantage is there to having them. Worse they are JUST enough different that a whole slew of new feats and changes to existing feats had to be added in, which just adds MORE clutter.</p><p></p><p>Basically the players I have are smart players but they are typical players too. They don't care about having 9812 different feats to have to wade through. More than that ironically with all that material the most common situation we run into is someone wants to do X with their character and cannot because you have to deal with so many different requirements and interactions and restrictions and they really have a hard time seeing the forest for the trees. More trees ain't going to make things better.</p><p></p><p>I mean in theory if Mike and his merry crew wanted to go wipe the slate clean and start over and build a game that used Essentials style classes and could make things simpler and better by doing so that would be fine, but that is also not what is happening here. The reason I say Essentials is likely to hurt the game more than help it is that out there in the real world the biggest enemy of 4e is its own sheer size and the difficulty of players getting hold of all the options. Adding MORE options is not a cure for that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 5331385, member: 82106"] Except the problem is the EXISTENCE of so many redundant but mechanically VERY slightly different options. I don't have a problem with what Essentials IS, I have a problem that it is AT ALL. The other night one of my players expressed a desire to play a fighter. Now this player is not super rules savvy and I'm not even sure owns any 4e books at all outside of a PHB1 and a DDI subscription. Right now this instant she can go into CB and already will see a substantial number of options, 5 builds of Fighter, 3 builds of Barbarian, at least 3 of Warden, all of which could be interesting. Why does she need at least 2 MORE subclasses of Fighter that will soon pop up in her CB? What character can you build with these that you couldn't build before? What advantage is there to having them. Worse they are JUST enough different that a whole slew of new feats and changes to existing feats had to be added in, which just adds MORE clutter. Basically the players I have are smart players but they are typical players too. They don't care about having 9812 different feats to have to wade through. More than that ironically with all that material the most common situation we run into is someone wants to do X with their character and cannot because you have to deal with so many different requirements and interactions and restrictions and they really have a hard time seeing the forest for the trees. More trees ain't going to make things better. I mean in theory if Mike and his merry crew wanted to go wipe the slate clean and start over and build a game that used Essentials style classes and could make things simpler and better by doing so that would be fine, but that is also not what is happening here. The reason I say Essentials is likely to hurt the game more than help it is that out there in the real world the biggest enemy of 4e is its own sheer size and the difficulty of players getting hold of all the options. Adding MORE options is not a cure for that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New Essentials Builds!
Top