Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New FAQ at Wizards - Behind the Screen with magic item creation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Artoomis" data-source="post: 2626302" data-attributes="member: 111"><p>Hmmm.. the issues at hand seem to be whether another spellcaster can supply the spell for creating a magic items and whether the caster level can be set by the creator regardless of the spell level supplied by a another cooperative spell caster. The general rule is:</p><p></p><p>Seems pretty clear so far. Anyone can cast the spells needed, or they can be off of scrolls, and the <strong><em>caster level can be no lower than that needed for the spells required.</em></strong></p><p></p><p>Only Rings do not have the rule that:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This leads us to one of three conclusions (choose which one you like best):</p><p></p><p>1. Creating rings (and only rings) allows cooperation or for spells to be from items (scrolls, etc.) per the general rule. (Except the laguage on "prepared spells" excludes using items, if read very strictly).</p><p></p><p>2. The specific rules are all in error (or perhaps merely poorly phrased) and really don't mean to be restrictive to only the creator needing the spell.</p><p></p><p>3 The general rule is in error and even rings don't really allow cooperation. The fact that the similar statement about the creator needing the spell is missing is an oversight.</p><p></p><p>I'd toss number 3 out right away, myself.</p><p></p><p>Number 1 actually follows the rules as written, but leads one to wonder why a general rule was even published if only ring creation follows that rule - and, even then, not the whole rule, leaving a general rule that CANNOT be followed under any cirumstances. That's does not make sense form a rules perspective and therefore is suspect.</p><p></p><p>This leads me to think that number 2 is the correct rule, and that all this business of the creator needing the spell available him- or herself is misstated and simply poorly written and is true only if the creator happens to NOT have cooperation, and, in the latter case applies to the spell donor.</p><p></p><p>There you have it. Strict readfing would probably lead one incorrectly to conlcusion number 1 above, but that leaves one wondering why a rule is stated and then every creation rule other than riings does not follow that rule. Something is clearly wroing there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Artoomis, post: 2626302, member: 111"] Hmmm.. the issues at hand seem to be whether another spellcaster can supply the spell for creating a magic items and whether the caster level can be set by the creator regardless of the spell level supplied by a another cooperative spell caster. The general rule is: Seems pretty clear so far. Anyone can cast the spells needed, or they can be off of scrolls, and the [b][i]caster level can be no lower than that needed for the spells required.[/i][/b][i][/i] Only Rings do not have the rule that: This leads us to one of three conclusions (choose which one you like best): 1. Creating rings (and only rings) allows cooperation or for spells to be from items (scrolls, etc.) per the general rule. (Except the laguage on "prepared spells" excludes using items, if read very strictly). 2. The specific rules are all in error (or perhaps merely poorly phrased) and really don't mean to be restrictive to only the creator needing the spell. 3 The general rule is in error and even rings don't really allow cooperation. The fact that the similar statement about the creator needing the spell is missing is an oversight. I'd toss number 3 out right away, myself. Number 1 actually follows the rules as written, but leads one to wonder why a general rule was even published if only ring creation follows that rule - and, even then, not the whole rule, leaving a general rule that CANNOT be followed under any cirumstances. That's does not make sense form a rules perspective and therefore is suspect. This leads me to think that number 2 is the correct rule, and that all this business of the creator needing the spell available him- or herself is misstated and simply poorly written and is true only if the creator happens to NOT have cooperation, and, in the latter case applies to the spell donor. There you have it. Strict readfing would probably lead one incorrectly to conlcusion number 1 above, but that leaves one wondering why a rule is stated and then every creation rule other than riings does not follow that rule. Something is clearly wroing there. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New FAQ at Wizards - Behind the Screen with magic item creation
Top