Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Blacksad" data-source="post: 100171" data-attributes="member: 1359">Considering this:&quot;You can trade a spell with another caster for another spell of the same level from them&quot;You do not really need this in the description:&quot;This feat may never be used to trade for a spell of a higher level than the character can actually cast himself.&quot;You have forgotten to say if both caster need the feat (I would say that they do not, or the feat would get from category &quot;might be nice to have&quot; to &quot;not worth the price&quot;)edit: in my campaign, even if lots of spellcasters learn their art in a great school, they are individual and do not form company or guild, if in your campaign their is a guild, then the &quot;both caster need the feat&quot; might work (in fact with guild if only one caster need the feat player will perhaps tend to not take it, especialy if their is a caster in the guild that have the feat, but then it will perhaps transform in a must have feat wich is not good either), but I'll prefer the option that only one caster needs the feat.On the prerequisite, some spellcaster have their power based on other score than int wis or cha, I think you should drop this and maybe augment the spellcaster level requirment or authorize this feat as a first level only feat.and perhaps removing the &quot;divine, wizard, sorceror&quot;replacing it with metamagic, and spell affected by this feat are +0 level, that way classes who get metamagic bonus feats could get it easily.And I might add: it's a great feat!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Blacksad, post: 100171, member: 1359"] Considering this: "You can trade a spell with another caster for another spell of the same level from them" You do not really need this in the description: "This feat may never be used to trade for a spell of a higher level than the character can actually cast himself." You have forgotten to say if both caster need the feat (I would say that they do not, or the feat would get from category "might be nice to have" to "not worth the price") edit: in my campaign, even if lots of spellcasters learn their art in a great school, they are individual and do not form company or guild, if in your campaign their is a guild, then the "both caster need the feat" might work (in fact with guild if only one caster need the feat player will perhaps tend to not take it, especialy if their is a caster in the guild that have the feat, but then it will perhaps transform in a must have feat wich is not good either), but I'll prefer the option that only one caster needs the feat. On the prerequisite, some spellcaster have their power based on other score than int wis or cha, I think you should drop this and maybe augment the spellcaster level requirment or authorize this feat as a first level only feat. and perhaps removing the "divine, wizard, sorceror" replacing it with metamagic, and spell affected by this feat are +0 level, that way classes who get metamagic bonus feats could get it easily. And I might add: it's a great feat! [/QUOTE]

Verification