Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Feats Survey!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 8535074" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>I suspect they really don't need any more specific data on the feats in question. It's been seven years and hundreds (if not thousands) of emails, twitter responses, message board threads, blog posts and YouTube videos all making it pretty plain what are the overpowered and underpowered feats in the game. They aren't deaf and blind, it's pretty much been made abundantly clear to WotC on this front. So I don't think this survey is really meant to remind them which ones need fixing and which ones don't (and how they should be fixed)...</p><p></p><p>...but rather get a sense whether a predominant number of players <em>actually care</em> about the balance of the feats in question. The vocal contingent has made it known over the last seven years their problems with feats in total and specific feats in general, but WotC probably doesn't yet know if they are a vocal <em>majority</em> or vocal <em>minority</em>. This survey will give them a better idea.</p><p></p><p>I mean if half of the respondents give poor marks to Sharpshooter and Great Weapon Master... they'll know exactly why this is the case, even without a box allowing the respondents to tell them. And at 50% dissatisfaction they might be more inclined to review the mechanics and perhaps change them for 2024. But if only 1 in 20 people give those feats poor marks and the rest think of them as completely fine or perhaps even liked... then they will know that the small vocal minority who are the hardcore "game balance" people do not necessarily need to be catered to if it would involve a lot of unnecessary changes that most players don't care about. After all... that minority of people have been playing the last seven years having theoretically fixed their issues with those feats (either by banning or re-working them)... and will do so again if WotC doesn't make any mass changes. I don't think WotC is looking to do a massive overhaul of the game, but rather strategic surgery... so if most people feel certain things are adequate, then they won't make major adjustments despite a smaller group thinking it's required.</p><p></p><p>So the question now is just <em>how many</em> players really don't like how certain feats work. And if you want any changes, you better hope you are not alone in your disgruntlement.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 8535074, member: 7006"] I suspect they really don't need any more specific data on the feats in question. It's been seven years and hundreds (if not thousands) of emails, twitter responses, message board threads, blog posts and YouTube videos all making it pretty plain what are the overpowered and underpowered feats in the game. They aren't deaf and blind, it's pretty much been made abundantly clear to WotC on this front. So I don't think this survey is really meant to remind them which ones need fixing and which ones don't (and how they should be fixed)... ...but rather get a sense whether a predominant number of players [I]actually care[/I] about the balance of the feats in question. The vocal contingent has made it known over the last seven years their problems with feats in total and specific feats in general, but WotC probably doesn't yet know if they are a vocal [I]majority[/I] or vocal [I]minority[/I]. This survey will give them a better idea. I mean if half of the respondents give poor marks to Sharpshooter and Great Weapon Master... they'll know exactly why this is the case, even without a box allowing the respondents to tell them. And at 50% dissatisfaction they might be more inclined to review the mechanics and perhaps change them for 2024. But if only 1 in 20 people give those feats poor marks and the rest think of them as completely fine or perhaps even liked... then they will know that the small vocal minority who are the hardcore "game balance" people do not necessarily need to be catered to if it would involve a lot of unnecessary changes that most players don't care about. After all... that minority of people have been playing the last seven years having theoretically fixed their issues with those feats (either by banning or re-working them)... and will do so again if WotC doesn't make any mass changes. I don't think WotC is looking to do a massive overhaul of the game, but rather strategic surgery... so if most people feel certain things are adequate, then they won't make major adjustments despite a smaller group thinking it's required. So the question now is just [I]how many[/I] players really don't like how certain feats work. And if you want any changes, you better hope you are not alone in your disgruntlement. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Feats Survey!
Top