Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Fighting Style: Swift Striker
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hawk Diesel" data-source="post: 7467977" data-attributes="member: 59848"><p>If I do that, it decreases the damage significantly to the point that I don't see a person taking the fighting style since it is so inferior to the other styles using optimized weapons. So while it would limit abuse of combining with other fighting styles, it would ONLY become viable if you combine it with other fighting styles. If the goal is to have the fighting style stand on its own while reducing possibility of abuse, then we need to consider something else.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I agree. But sadly, that isn't a thing in 5e. :-(</p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p>Not sure I follow. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yea, I don't like the "requires a free hand to use." Combining TWF and Swift Striker seems to only moderately increase DPR over TWF or Swift Striker alone. Before extra attack, the difference is about 2 points of damage, with the difference falling for each additional attack until the difference of only 0.5 damage when a fighter can get 3 attacks with the attack action. </p><p></p><p>And actually, combining Dueling style with Swift Fighter also puts it in relative range of TWF alone. The problem is that not only is it typically slightly higher than TWF, but you also get access to a shield. This assessment would change if we assume feats and give the TWF the Dual Wielder feat, putting them at about equal AC and damage output, but if we require a feat investment to equate the synergy, it points to an imbalance from my perspective.</p><p></p><p>But then, is the imbalance great enough to be a concern? I mean, gaining multiple Fighting Styles is really only achievable with a Champion Fighter, through multiclassing, or with a feat investment if you have a feat that allows acquisition of a fighting style (which I do have). The question becomes, is the opportunity cost for multiclassing or the feat tax great enough to balance out increased DPR and AC?</p><p></p><p>I feel like I kind of vacillate between yes and no. Is the synergy of the fighting styles powerful? Sure. Is it so powerful that everyone that takes it would multiclass for another fighting style? Or is it so powerful that everyone that took this style would also grab a feat to combine it with another fighting style? I'm not sure.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hawk Diesel, post: 7467977, member: 59848"] If I do that, it decreases the damage significantly to the point that I don't see a person taking the fighting style since it is so inferior to the other styles using optimized weapons. So while it would limit abuse of combining with other fighting styles, it would ONLY become viable if you combine it with other fighting styles. If the goal is to have the fighting style stand on its own while reducing possibility of abuse, then we need to consider something else. I agree. But sadly, that isn't a thing in 5e. :-( Not sure I follow. Yea, I don't like the "requires a free hand to use." Combining TWF and Swift Striker seems to only moderately increase DPR over TWF or Swift Striker alone. Before extra attack, the difference is about 2 points of damage, with the difference falling for each additional attack until the difference of only 0.5 damage when a fighter can get 3 attacks with the attack action. And actually, combining Dueling style with Swift Fighter also puts it in relative range of TWF alone. The problem is that not only is it typically slightly higher than TWF, but you also get access to a shield. This assessment would change if we assume feats and give the TWF the Dual Wielder feat, putting them at about equal AC and damage output, but if we require a feat investment to equate the synergy, it points to an imbalance from my perspective. But then, is the imbalance great enough to be a concern? I mean, gaining multiple Fighting Styles is really only achievable with a Champion Fighter, through multiclassing, or with a feat investment if you have a feat that allows acquisition of a fighting style (which I do have). The question becomes, is the opportunity cost for multiclassing or the feat tax great enough to balance out increased DPR and AC? I feel like I kind of vacillate between yes and no. Is the synergy of the fighting styles powerful? Sure. Is it so powerful that everyone that takes it would multiclass for another fighting style? Or is it so powerful that everyone that took this style would also grab a feat to combine it with another fighting style? I'm not sure. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Fighting Style: Swift Striker
Top