Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Roman" data-source="post: 4723839" data-attributes="member: 1845">ROFL, but considering what has been done it rings eerily true! <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/paranoid.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":uhoh:" title="Paranoid    :uhoh:" data-shortname=":uhoh:" />I am in complete agreement with you here. It's not that the new setting is necessarily bad, it's just that it isn't Forgotten Realms any more. To be honest, I don't even see much commercial sense in it. After all, WotC has another wildly successful setting, Eberron, that does not have the backlog of lore, does not have such high-level NPCs and so on - so they already cater to the market of gamers that prefers that. Even if that market is bigger, wouldn't it also make sense to support, perhaps with fewer sourcebooks if it is not as big as the other market, the market of gamers who love FR and its complexity, lore, characters and so on?</blockquote>