Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New haste on WotC website!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LordAO" data-source="post: 874115" data-attributes="member: 6010"><p>Even a specialist Wizards doesn't have as many spells per day as a Cleric! The Wizard gets a base of 4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4 at 20th level, the cleric gets 6/5/5/5/5/5/4/4/4/4 plus domain spells!</p><p></p><p>IMO the Wizards should be a better spellcaster than the Cleric, not worse. Clerics have d8 hps, wiz have d4. clerics have the medium attack bonus, wizards have the worst, clerics have good fort and will saves, wiz only good will, clerics can wear armor and use spells without problems, clerics have better weapon proficiencies, clerics have better class skill selction, they get all of their spells for FREE, etc etc etc.</p><p></p><p>Since the cleric is nearly as good a fighter as a fighter, isn't it only fair the the Wizard who is solely dedicated to spellcasting should be better at it? Yet they give the Wizard LESS spells per day than the cleric, especially when you count domain spells. Sure, a Wiz can specialize, but they requires a huge sacrifice by the Wiz. And even that doesn't even the playing field.</p><p></p><p>So, no I didn't mind the old haste at all. It was the one and only Wizard buff spell that was on par with Clerical buffs. And I don't know about the idea that Wizards shouldn't be good in combat. Look at all the combat spells they have! And the old haste never made the fighter obsolite at all, at least not in the games I've played! Wizards do have a broad selection of spells, for in and out of combat, this is true. But Wizards also have the preparation problem. Wizards have a limited supply of magical firepower. And they have to think very carefully about when and where to use it. Every spell they cast in one battle is one less spell they will have later, when they might need it most. And even then, the damage potential of spells is better than what a fighter can deal in a single attack, but unlike the fighter it can't be used every round. Fighters really don't have limits on what they do best. They always were and always will be the best at combat, despite haste and other considerations. Besides, I usually did cast haste on my friends as well, not just myself.</p><p></p><p>The class you should worry about is the Cleric, not the Wizard. After all, they are nearly equal to fighters already, plus add in more spells than even a Wizard can do, spells like Harm and Heal, and definately all of the best buff spells in the game, and a CLeric can easily surpass every other class in performance, both in and out of combat.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LordAO, post: 874115, member: 6010"] Even a specialist Wizards doesn't have as many spells per day as a Cleric! The Wizard gets a base of 4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4 at 20th level, the cleric gets 6/5/5/5/5/5/4/4/4/4 plus domain spells! IMO the Wizards should be a better spellcaster than the Cleric, not worse. Clerics have d8 hps, wiz have d4. clerics have the medium attack bonus, wizards have the worst, clerics have good fort and will saves, wiz only good will, clerics can wear armor and use spells without problems, clerics have better weapon proficiencies, clerics have better class skill selction, they get all of their spells for FREE, etc etc etc. Since the cleric is nearly as good a fighter as a fighter, isn't it only fair the the Wizard who is solely dedicated to spellcasting should be better at it? Yet they give the Wizard LESS spells per day than the cleric, especially when you count domain spells. Sure, a Wiz can specialize, but they requires a huge sacrifice by the Wiz. And even that doesn't even the playing field. So, no I didn't mind the old haste at all. It was the one and only Wizard buff spell that was on par with Clerical buffs. And I don't know about the idea that Wizards shouldn't be good in combat. Look at all the combat spells they have! And the old haste never made the fighter obsolite at all, at least not in the games I've played! Wizards do have a broad selection of spells, for in and out of combat, this is true. But Wizards also have the preparation problem. Wizards have a limited supply of magical firepower. And they have to think very carefully about when and where to use it. Every spell they cast in one battle is one less spell they will have later, when they might need it most. And even then, the damage potential of spells is better than what a fighter can deal in a single attack, but unlike the fighter it can't be used every round. Fighters really don't have limits on what they do best. They always were and always will be the best at combat, despite haste and other considerations. Besides, I usually did cast haste on my friends as well, not just myself. The class you should worry about is the Cleric, not the Wizard. After all, they are nearly equal to fighters already, plus add in more spells than even a Wizard can do, spells like Harm and Heal, and definately all of the best buff spells in the game, and a CLeric can easily surpass every other class in performance, both in and out of combat. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New haste on WotC website!
Top