Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
New In-Game Slang Based On Your Games
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jeffh" data-source="post: 2002786" data-attributes="member: 2642"><p>To "Go for a ladder" is for a plan to go disastrously wrong. This started when someone in a Traveller game literally went to get a ladder during a firefight, and by a chain of events I'm not sure of, this resulted in the deaths of two other PCs. I wasn't in that game (well, for one session I was, but it wasn't that one) but most of my players at the time were participants in it, including the GM of that game, the player who went for the ladder, my sister and my then-girlfriend. So naturally the phrase spilled over to my group.</p><p></p><p>"That's only three for each of us!" is used as a putdown whenever someone expresses willingness to do something that it's obvious to everyone else would constitute going for a ladder. This one is my fault; it was the line I uttered in a D&D game I was playing in that convinced a party of first and second level characters to as good as charge into something like twelve skeletons and six zombies; there was only one survivor. (Of course, it didn't help that the other five players <strong>all</strong> thoguht getting a wall behind us was somehow a good idea; even in the stupidity that had apparently gripped me, I knew enough to fight that part of it, but I lost.)</p><p></p><p>Another one that migrated over from a game I wasn't in was "But there's <em>fish</em>!". This is mainly used one one character (not necessarily player) doesn't want to do something because of trivial dangers or because it involves something gross. It started with a fairy character in a Rifts game refusing to dive into a river to retrieve something. The character was so small a fish might swallow her; this would do her no harm whatsoever, as the character had megadamage capacity (if you're not familiar with Palladium mechanics think of it as DR 100 / Tank shells), but <em>ewww</em>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jeffh, post: 2002786, member: 2642"] To "Go for a ladder" is for a plan to go disastrously wrong. This started when someone in a Traveller game literally went to get a ladder during a firefight, and by a chain of events I'm not sure of, this resulted in the deaths of two other PCs. I wasn't in that game (well, for one session I was, but it wasn't that one) but most of my players at the time were participants in it, including the GM of that game, the player who went for the ladder, my sister and my then-girlfriend. So naturally the phrase spilled over to my group. "That's only three for each of us!" is used as a putdown whenever someone expresses willingness to do something that it's obvious to everyone else would constitute going for a ladder. This one is my fault; it was the line I uttered in a D&D game I was playing in that convinced a party of first and second level characters to as good as charge into something like twelve skeletons and six zombies; there was only one survivor. (Of course, it didn't help that the other five players [B]all[/B] thoguht getting a wall behind us was somehow a good idea; even in the stupidity that had apparently gripped me, I knew enough to fight that part of it, but I lost.) Another one that migrated over from a game I wasn't in was "But there's [I]fish[/I]!". This is mainly used one one character (not necessarily player) doesn't want to do something because of trivial dangers or because it involves something gross. It started with a fairy character in a Rifts game refusing to dive into a river to retrieve something. The character was so small a fish might swallow her; this would do her no harm whatsoever, as the character had megadamage capacity (if you're not familiar with Palladium mechanics think of it as DR 100 / Tank shells), but [I]ewww[/I]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
New In-Game Slang Based On Your Games
Top