Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
New Legends and Lore:Head of the Class
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 5632427" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>Have your read FATAL? I know the comparison is meant to be a light-hearted one, but in my view it actually obscures as much as, if not more than, it illuminates.</p><p></p><p>To run a tolerable session of FATAL, you would have to override and/or ignore the mechanics. When I run a tolerable skill challenge, though, I don't ignore the mechanics, nor override them. I use them, and build on them, in various ways.</p><p></p><p>And while it's flattering of you to call my a good GM, I don't want to take all the credit! I didn't work out how to do what I do on my own. I had rulebooks to help me. Just not the WotC ones. Which means I also think your reference to "working harder" is a little hyperbolic. It's not particularly hard work in 4e to build and run an interesting combat encounter, because the guidelines are there to help you: monsters classified by role, lots of terrain features presented in a fairly systematic way, sample encounter groupings, and plenty of advice on how to put it all together, and on what effects different choices will have.</p><p></p><p>Giving <em>that</em> level of advice for skill challenges wouldn't make GMs have to work harder. It would make our lives <em>easier</em>, because we wouldn't have to do it from first principles, or adapt advice for HeroQuest and Maelstrom across to the slightly different framework of skill challenges.</p><p></p><p>I've got nothing against any of this. But I don't think it needs to start with a complete rebuild. A lot of this can, in principle, be done with what's there: we've already got encounter and daily powers, healing surges, action points, rituals, other forms of gp expenditure, "advantages" etc (per DMG2 and RC), all of which create economies and attrition and allow victories that cost. Retreat can be incorporated in the evolution of a "structure" challenge (per DMG2). Challenges fighting back is <em>not</em> really discussed at all, and (as I've said above) I think is the one thing on your list that can't be done with the current mechanics <em>other than</em> in a narrative fashion (by "pouring on the pressure").</p><p></p><p>But where is the advice and guidelines on how to use encounter and daily powers, healing surges, action points, rituals, other expenditure, advantages? It's not there - half a page in DMG2 and a sidebar in RC don't cut it. Imagine trying to build and run 4e combats with no more than a page of advice! That's what we're trying to do with skill challenges - and, in my view, <em>that's</em> what makes it hard.</p><p></p><p>Again, I'm not saying that alternative mechanics couldn't achieve what you're looking for - and, for at least some groups and GMs, be prefereable to a "pour on the pressure" approach. But it would require rebuilding from the ground up, both in respect of character building and action resolution mechanics. So we're not going to see it for a long time, if ever. Whereas better advice, guidelines, examples, illustrations of actual play (and not imagined idealised actual play, but <em>actual</em> actual play), etc - stuff that made what we already have easy to work with - could be done, if not literally overnight, at least in a timeframe of weeks and months.</p><p></p><p>I mean, the models are there - HeroQuest extended contests (yes, these have active opposition, but much more abstract than 4e combat - I think it could be replicated by a sophisticated mix of DC-setting and "advantages", and action points or power use could be used to emulate the resource-dynamics of Hero Points); and Maelstrom Storytelling's scene resolution (I haven't got my rules in front of me, but from memory these have less active opposition and rely more on narrative pressure - and they have a system of "quick takes", based on resource expenditure, to allow limited victories to be snatched from overall defeat - which could be amulated in 4e via action points, powers and/or advantages).</p><p></p><p>The other place where work could be done would be in the existing areas of feat and utility powers (including skill powers). This could help fill your "This happens" space (although I think skills can also be used in this way - "this happens", but <em>what else</em> happens depends on how the skill roll turns out).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 5632427, member: 42582"] Have your read FATAL? I know the comparison is meant to be a light-hearted one, but in my view it actually obscures as much as, if not more than, it illuminates. To run a tolerable session of FATAL, you would have to override and/or ignore the mechanics. When I run a tolerable skill challenge, though, I don't ignore the mechanics, nor override them. I use them, and build on them, in various ways. And while it's flattering of you to call my a good GM, I don't want to take all the credit! I didn't work out how to do what I do on my own. I had rulebooks to help me. Just not the WotC ones. Which means I also think your reference to "working harder" is a little hyperbolic. It's not particularly hard work in 4e to build and run an interesting combat encounter, because the guidelines are there to help you: monsters classified by role, lots of terrain features presented in a fairly systematic way, sample encounter groupings, and plenty of advice on how to put it all together, and on what effects different choices will have. Giving [I]that[/I] level of advice for skill challenges wouldn't make GMs have to work harder. It would make our lives [I]easier[/I], because we wouldn't have to do it from first principles, or adapt advice for HeroQuest and Maelstrom across to the slightly different framework of skill challenges. I've got nothing against any of this. But I don't think it needs to start with a complete rebuild. A lot of this can, in principle, be done with what's there: we've already got encounter and daily powers, healing surges, action points, rituals, other forms of gp expenditure, "advantages" etc (per DMG2 and RC), all of which create economies and attrition and allow victories that cost. Retreat can be incorporated in the evolution of a "structure" challenge (per DMG2). Challenges fighting back is [I]not[/I] really discussed at all, and (as I've said above) I think is the one thing on your list that can't be done with the current mechanics [I]other than[/I] in a narrative fashion (by "pouring on the pressure"). But where is the advice and guidelines on how to use encounter and daily powers, healing surges, action points, rituals, other expenditure, advantages? It's not there - half a page in DMG2 and a sidebar in RC don't cut it. Imagine trying to build and run 4e combats with no more than a page of advice! That's what we're trying to do with skill challenges - and, in my view, [I]that's[/I] what makes it hard. Again, I'm not saying that alternative mechanics couldn't achieve what you're looking for - and, for at least some groups and GMs, be prefereable to a "pour on the pressure" approach. But it would require rebuilding from the ground up, both in respect of character building and action resolution mechanics. So we're not going to see it for a long time, if ever. Whereas better advice, guidelines, examples, illustrations of actual play (and not imagined idealised actual play, but [I]actual[/I] actual play), etc - stuff that made what we already have easy to work with - could be done, if not literally overnight, at least in a timeframe of weeks and months. I mean, the models are there - HeroQuest extended contests (yes, these have active opposition, but much more abstract than 4e combat - I think it could be replicated by a sophisticated mix of DC-setting and "advantages", and action points or power use could be used to emulate the resource-dynamics of Hero Points); and Maelstrom Storytelling's scene resolution (I haven't got my rules in front of me, but from memory these have less active opposition and rely more on narrative pressure - and they have a system of "quick takes", based on resource expenditure, to allow limited victories to be snatched from overall defeat - which could be amulated in 4e via action points, powers and/or advantages). The other place where work could be done would be in the existing areas of feat and utility powers (including skill powers). This could help fill your "This happens" space (although I think skills can also be used in this way - "this happens", but [I]what else[/I] happens depends on how the skill roll turns out). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
New Legends and Lore:Head of the Class
Top