Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 5487723" data-attributes="member: 2067"><a href="http://wizards.com/dnd/Article.aspx?x=dnd/4ll/20110308" target="_blank">Mearls writes about increasing complexity, and the Fighter</a>. Not behind a paywall. The red question at the end is nonsensical, but the paragraph before it reveals what's intended: do you like easy-to-play characters that are still very effective, or do you need to make 20 decisions about your special unique snowflake in order to kill goblins?Clearly, I have my biases. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> FWIW, I am a fan of the Legends and Lore articles. Even when Mearls seems to kind of miss the boat with the poll (he seems to exclude a middle ground here, as he has in other polls), it's an interesting look into how we got where we are today.</blockquote>