Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="catsclaw227" data-source="post: 3427417" data-attributes="member: 14197">Personally, I don't run the Realms for similar reasons.&nbsp; First, I don't know enough about the canon or the many, many books and what has happened and who's who.&nbsp; If I were to advertise for players in an FR game, they would know a lot more than I would about the setting. And quite frankly, I want to be &quot;the expert&quot; in the setting I am GMing.&nbsp; I like Scarred Lands, because I don't buy into the meta-story and it's fairly easy to run.&nbsp; I like the Wilderlands because of its open ended nature.&nbsp; I like Greyhawk because.... well, because I decided I didn't want to change the setting of my Savage Tide campaign, and it's in an area that my players know very little about.I might try Eberron, but I would likely try either the War of the Burning Sky AP, a homebrew --&gt; Oathbound game or a game set in the Warlords of the Accordlands next.The Realms just have TOO MUCH canonical history for my taste.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="catsclaw227, post: 3427417, member: 14197"] Personally, I don't run the Realms for similar reasons. First, I don't know enough about the canon or the many, many books and what has happened and who's who. If I were to advertise for players in an FR game, they would know a lot more than I would about the setting. And quite frankly, I want to be "the expert" in the setting I am GMing. I like Scarred Lands, because I don't buy into the meta-story and it's fairly easy to run. I like the Wilderlands because of its open ended nature. I like Greyhawk because.... well, because I decided I didn't want to change the setting of my Savage Tide campaign, and it's in an area that my players know very little about. I might try Eberron, but I would likely try either the War of the Burning Sky AP, a homebrew --> Oathbound game or a game set in the Warlords of the Accordlands next. The Realms just have TOO MUCH canonical history for my taste. [/QUOTE]

Verification