Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ShinHakkaider" data-source="post: 5814132" data-attributes="member: 9213">See I'd be fine if a 3rd Party company handled the conversions of PF material to 5E or D&amp;D Next. That way everyone wins. But if Paizo (and they've said that that they wouldn't do dual statted modules or books) starts supporting both, that means that they'll be putting less support into actual Pathfinder products which would potentially alienate their fans who have no intention or interest in playing or supporting 5E. I hope that Paizo's wait and see attitude is partially because theyre trying to figure out and time their next move in relation to the Pathfinder RPG. They've also made it very clear in the past that they are fine being their own masters and not hitching their wagons on to anyone else. They did that with WOTC already and as a result they had the licensees of both Dungeon and Dragon magazines pulled (with enough warning so they could finish the SAVAGE TIDE AP. YAY!) and we also never got our AGE OF WORMS and SAVAGE TIDE hardback AP's because of that. Lest everyone forget it was WOTC's restrictive GSL and inability to get 4E into the hands of the 3rd party companies well before 4E's official release (IMHO a purposeful move) that really kind of gave birth to the Pathfinder RPG to being with.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ShinHakkaider, post: 5814132, member: 9213"] See I'd be fine if a 3rd Party company handled the conversions of PF material to 5E or D&D Next. That way everyone wins. But if Paizo (and they've said that that they wouldn't do dual statted modules or books) starts supporting both, that means that they'll be putting less support into actual Pathfinder products which would potentially alienate their fans who have no intention or interest in playing or supporting 5E. I hope that Paizo's wait and see attitude is partially because theyre trying to figure out and time their next move in relation to the Pathfinder RPG. They've also made it very clear in the past that they are fine being their own masters and not hitching their wagons on to anyone else. They did that with WOTC already and as a result they had the licensees of both Dungeon and Dragon magazines pulled (with enough warning so they could finish the SAVAGE TIDE AP. YAY!) and we also never got our AGE OF WORMS and SAVAGE TIDE hardback AP's because of that. Lest everyone forget it was WOTC's restrictive GSL and inability to get 4E into the hands of the 3rd party companies well before 4E's official release (IMHO a purposeful move) that really kind of gave birth to the Pathfinder RPG to being with. [/QUOTE]

Verification