Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New Mechanic: Equipment Limits (Poise Update 8/15)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Exen Trik" data-source="post: 3684157" data-attributes="member: 34942"><p>You're right on that, I'll be having simple weapons use the same rules as martial and exotic ones. </p><p></p><p></p><p> Aptitude sounds alright, although the word is more associated with learning. I was actually considering using "Power", general as it may be. Capability works fine for the overall term in place of limits, and like capacity it can be shortened to "Cap" which fits nicely: the equipment limit is "Might Cap" for example. </p><p></p><p>I'm not going to change the terms just yet though, when I start releasing larger portions of the project I'll have names and such updated. I'm just going to worry about the mechanics for this thread here.</p><p></p><p>I don't think it is really a problem. It doesn't make any class stronger than before, their poor limits are things they shouldn't need as much and they often won't need all of their good ones. As for monks, I'm considering some special rules for them in this system.</p><p></p><p> The point here is to reinforce archtypical equipment when multiclassing is common enough that proficiency is less an issue. But if you want to remove that and make everything the same for every player of every build, well thats fine too, it's really just a different style. They should otherwise work the same though.</p><p></p><p>I do want the effect of exceeding your might score to be severe enough to warrant not doing it at all. A penalty to hit of -1 per point does that well enough, and unless you are a heavily armored rogue or bard it should hardly ever come up. Still, I've reconsidered the AC penalty, even for only dex bonuses so I'll just remove it. Armor does that already anyways.</p><p></p><p>I had actually considered tying up all the effects of armor into this system: the movement, check penalties, arcane failure, etc. I decided not to go there, since balancing it all would be difficult, or at least more complicated than I'm going for.</p><p></p><p>I'll be updating the main post soon to reflect these changes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Exen Trik, post: 3684157, member: 34942"] You're right on that, I'll be having simple weapons use the same rules as martial and exotic ones. Aptitude sounds alright, although the word is more associated with learning. I was actually considering using "Power", general as it may be. Capability works fine for the overall term in place of limits, and like capacity it can be shortened to "Cap" which fits nicely: the equipment limit is "Might Cap" for example. I'm not going to change the terms just yet though, when I start releasing larger portions of the project I'll have names and such updated. I'm just going to worry about the mechanics for this thread here. I don't think it is really a problem. It doesn't make any class stronger than before, their poor limits are things they shouldn't need as much and they often won't need all of their good ones. As for monks, I'm considering some special rules for them in this system. The point here is to reinforce archtypical equipment when multiclassing is common enough that proficiency is less an issue. But if you want to remove that and make everything the same for every player of every build, well thats fine too, it's really just a different style. They should otherwise work the same though. I do want the effect of exceeding your might score to be severe enough to warrant not doing it at all. A penalty to hit of -1 per point does that well enough, and unless you are a heavily armored rogue or bard it should hardly ever come up. Still, I've reconsidered the AC penalty, even for only dex bonuses so I'll just remove it. Armor does that already anyways. I had actually considered tying up all the effects of armor into this system: the movement, check penalties, arcane failure, etc. I decided not to go there, since balancing it all would be difficult, or at least more complicated than I'm going for. I'll be updating the main post soon to reflect these changes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New Mechanic: Equipment Limits (Poise Update 8/15)
Top