Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New Mindflayer Info
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jaer" data-source="post: 4000245" data-attributes="member: 57861"><p>It is useful for abuse, too. I like to reward creativity, but I do try to balance such things. Such a case as this, I would either apply a modifier to the save or require a second save of the like, or even requiring two applications of suggestion in this case: one to suggest the demon look-alike, the other to kill the look alike.</p><p></p><p>Hypocritcal of me? Perhaps, but I also dislike making a "kill" suggestion since hypnotises people will break free of such suggestions before killing someone.</p><p></p><p>I would not allow the "don't use a weapon when fighting us" suggest to work some small, weak creature. The arrogant orc chief, yes. He wants to show just how powerful he is. After he is getting his butt kicked , the suggestion is no longer reasonable. He might be contemptuous still, but he realizes after a couple rounds he cannot cannot continue this way: I'd either give him a resave or have him break it completely (depending on the beating he just took).</p><p></p><p>Same for the armor-removal. If the person took a hit while he was removing his armor, he would realize that doing so is unreasonable. I would allow him a resave on the effect, and if he didn't make the save, perhaps let him continue to fight in the armor but with some negatives for the discomfort it is creating for him (basically counting him as unproficient in that armor type). Depending on how much time he spent taking off the armor, he might have reduced AC (whether he shook off the suggestion or not).</p><p></p><p>It might not be RAW, but when it comes to abstract and very abusal spells like Suggestion (truely could be one of the most powerful spells if not handle carefully!), I take matters into my own hands. I don't want to say "Wow! Awesome suggestion there...great work wording that. Yeah, that can't happen though; too potent. But great job!"</p><p></p><p>I want to reward my players, so if I need to do things like add resaves and partially successful suggestions to keep it fair and balanced, I do it.</p><p></p><p>Not that I typically have these problems. My players aren't quite so creative; they tend to think Suggestion sucks (too open, and they don't want to think about what they can get it to do). Which is why I would save my wicked Suggestions for when I was a player, so I don't completely wreck the PCs with the BBEG enchanter. Though, looks like my Enchanter/Mindbender won't be playable in 4e, not until psions come out...but I can wait.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jaer, post: 4000245, member: 57861"] It is useful for abuse, too. I like to reward creativity, but I do try to balance such things. Such a case as this, I would either apply a modifier to the save or require a second save of the like, or even requiring two applications of suggestion in this case: one to suggest the demon look-alike, the other to kill the look alike. Hypocritcal of me? Perhaps, but I also dislike making a "kill" suggestion since hypnotises people will break free of such suggestions before killing someone. I would not allow the "don't use a weapon when fighting us" suggest to work some small, weak creature. The arrogant orc chief, yes. He wants to show just how powerful he is. After he is getting his butt kicked , the suggestion is no longer reasonable. He might be contemptuous still, but he realizes after a couple rounds he cannot cannot continue this way: I'd either give him a resave or have him break it completely (depending on the beating he just took). Same for the armor-removal. If the person took a hit while he was removing his armor, he would realize that doing so is unreasonable. I would allow him a resave on the effect, and if he didn't make the save, perhaps let him continue to fight in the armor but with some negatives for the discomfort it is creating for him (basically counting him as unproficient in that armor type). Depending on how much time he spent taking off the armor, he might have reduced AC (whether he shook off the suggestion or not). It might not be RAW, but when it comes to abstract and very abusal spells like Suggestion (truely could be one of the most powerful spells if not handle carefully!), I take matters into my own hands. I don't want to say "Wow! Awesome suggestion there...great work wording that. Yeah, that can't happen though; too potent. But great job!" I want to reward my players, so if I need to do things like add resaves and partially successful suggestions to keep it fair and balanced, I do it. Not that I typically have these problems. My players aren't quite so creative; they tend to think Suggestion sucks (too open, and they don't want to think about what they can get it to do). Which is why I would save my wicked Suggestions for when I was a player, so I don't completely wreck the PCs with the BBEG enchanter. Though, looks like my Enchanter/Mindbender won't be playable in 4e, not until psions come out...but I can wait. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New Mindflayer Info
Top