Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Kheti sa-Menik" data-source="post: 4562183" data-attributes="member: 22721">I liked D20 Modern actually.  I did think there were some problems, but on the whole it was a solid game.There major major issues with some followup books (D20 Past and Urban Arcana, I'm looking at you) but some of those were cool, like D20 Future, Critical Locations, and Weapons Locker.  I am a huge fan of combining the base D20 Modern book with RPGObjects stuff, especially Vigilance's awesome Blood and Vigilance..in fact the whole Blood and ... series gets top marks from me.  (Not to sound like a fanboy too much)I admit however I am not a big fan of what I've heard of Modern20.  I still need to buy a copy, but I've read the blurbs about it and some of it, if the description is accurate, kind of turns me off.  BUT I would like to get my hands on a copy to give it a thorough read through since Vigilance has done me good in the past.I think linking any of D20 Modern to any part of 4th Edition is bad bad bad news.  4th ED is so bad at being D&D, I can't imagine what it would do to my beloved D20 Modern.</blockquote>