Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
New Monte Cook article Magic and Mystery
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Janx" data-source="post: 5699966" data-attributes="member: 8835"><p>As a tool example, this came up in conversation the other day. In non-software development companies (ie, they don't write software as a product), IT shops will restrict and hand-out very baseline computers to every user. Developers need better computers, because the tools to write software often need more resources than the software itself. As a result, there's a often a conflict between IT and in-house development staff who need better than IT-expected computers.</p><p></p><p> 1GB ram on an XP PC may be fine for office staff. Totally won't cut it running Visual Studio 2010 (which is literally consuming 1GB of ram by itself on my PC as I write this).</p><p></p><p>Now using this metaphor of My PC = My D&D Sword of bonuses I want. One could argue that if all I have is a crappy PC, I should use a lighter developer tool. Technically I can write a program on the computer. However, to solve the problem at hand, I actually do need a more powerful PC.</p><p></p><p>The same goes for magic swords. Sure, I could stick to killing rats and goblins with my non-magic sword. But if I am actually confronted by a level appropriate monster that has magic requirements to hit (silver, +1, etc), then I actually do need a proper magic weapon.</p><p></p><p>D&D has ALWAYS suffered from this concept. Werewolves always needed magic or silver to-hit. Other monsters always needed magic of a minimum + to hit. This meant that if the PCs encountered it, they HAD to have the item or were probably screwed.</p><p></p><p>Which leads us to, which came first, the weapon, the monster, news of the monster, news of the weapon?</p><p></p><p>If the PCs go looking for the monster without the right weapon, that's their fault, but then odds are good experienced players aren't going to do that.</p><p></p><p>If they go looking for the weapon they NEED so they can kill the monster, this is effectively WISHLIST behavior. They are telling the GM they want a certain weapon by seeking it out in the game.</p><p></p><p>If the PCs just run into the monster, it's the GMs goal to kill/thwart them, since he knows they don't have the weapon to deal with it.</p><p></p><p>If the PCs get news of the monster, they have the opportunity to decide whether to avoid it, or go seek out the proper weapon to defeat it.</p><p></p><p>Part of the christmas tree effect, is monsters that NEED specific weapons to kill them. It reinforces the requirement that PCs of a certain level be carrying +X weapons because all the monsters at that level require it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Janx, post: 5699966, member: 8835"] As a tool example, this came up in conversation the other day. In non-software development companies (ie, they don't write software as a product), IT shops will restrict and hand-out very baseline computers to every user. Developers need better computers, because the tools to write software often need more resources than the software itself. As a result, there's a often a conflict between IT and in-house development staff who need better than IT-expected computers. 1GB ram on an XP PC may be fine for office staff. Totally won't cut it running Visual Studio 2010 (which is literally consuming 1GB of ram by itself on my PC as I write this). Now using this metaphor of My PC = My D&D Sword of bonuses I want. One could argue that if all I have is a crappy PC, I should use a lighter developer tool. Technically I can write a program on the computer. However, to solve the problem at hand, I actually do need a more powerful PC. The same goes for magic swords. Sure, I could stick to killing rats and goblins with my non-magic sword. But if I am actually confronted by a level appropriate monster that has magic requirements to hit (silver, +1, etc), then I actually do need a proper magic weapon. D&D has ALWAYS suffered from this concept. Werewolves always needed magic or silver to-hit. Other monsters always needed magic of a minimum + to hit. This meant that if the PCs encountered it, they HAD to have the item or were probably screwed. Which leads us to, which came first, the weapon, the monster, news of the monster, news of the weapon? If the PCs go looking for the monster without the right weapon, that's their fault, but then odds are good experienced players aren't going to do that. If they go looking for the weapon they NEED so they can kill the monster, this is effectively WISHLIST behavior. They are telling the GM they want a certain weapon by seeking it out in the game. If the PCs just run into the monster, it's the GMs goal to kill/thwart them, since he knows they don't have the weapon to deal with it. If the PCs get news of the monster, they have the opportunity to decide whether to avoid it, or go seek out the proper weapon to defeat it. Part of the christmas tree effect, is monsters that NEED specific weapons to kill them. It reinforces the requirement that PCs of a certain level be carrying +X weapons because all the monsters at that level require it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
New Monte Cook article Magic and Mystery
Top