Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Reaper Steve" data-source="post: 3748977" data-attributes="member: 51528">As I was contemplating my mock dialogue/explanation, I realized what is the source of my (and maybe others) consternation with the Warlord.Being able to lead others in combat is a developed skill that comes from experience. It follows logically (IMO) that a warlord/leader type would be a prestige class, fbut or the sake of the game (which is a prime directive, since it is a game) WotC is making a leader class that is playable from 1st level.So, I think it must be accepted in context. Fortunately, 1st level characters are shaping up to be very competent and clearly above the general populace, from what's been shown. So it may not be too much of a stretch to think that a 1st-level Warlord could have had enough experience in his past to be able to inspire others in combat.Hmmm...a 1st-level laeder? Yeah, I can accept that, in context. But I still think Warlord is not the right name, even in that context.  Oh well, fun to banter about, certainly not worth losing sleep over.  Speaking of which....ZZZZZ</blockquote>