Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Greg Benage" data-source="post: 8881957" data-attributes="member: 93631">For me, it’s all about revocation. Lose that, and I feel like they can do what they want with 1D&D and the license to its content. Honestly, I think as long as they have DM’s Guild, they’ll be just fine.I have no idea what y’all are thinking with the royalties based on “profits” idea. It doesn’t work like that. As you may know, we did a fair amount of licensing at FFG during my time (Tolkien Enterprises, George RR Martin, Blizzard, Lucasfilm, etc.), and I never saw a royalty based on “profits.”As a commercially published novelist, if a publisher came to me offering a royalty based on their “profits,” I’d…well, I’d just explain that I’m a writer, not an investor, and then I’d go send a note to the SFWA and Writer Beware.</blockquote>