Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
New OGL - what would be acceptable? (+)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scars Unseen" data-source="post: 8882063" data-attributes="member: 10196"><p>It depends on the level of "acceptability" we're talking. To avoid a scorched earth, self-harming boycott where I won't even buy material from older editions they have for PoD on DriveThruRPG and trying to convince anyone I ever game with again to do the same? Publicly scrapping 1.1 in total, and a show of intent not to invalidate 1.0a and earlier versions. If they want to make a GSL for 1D&D that only harms the 3pp space around the newest edition, that's their prerogative.</p><p></p><p>To get me to actually consider buying into 1D&D on whatever merits it may or may not possess as a product? They need to first do a <em>full</em> 180 of intent and fully enshrine the OGL with a new version that <em>closes</em> any loopholes they thought to exploit in 1.1 that protects all earlier editions of D&D and 3pp created for them - <em>including editions not currently included in the OGL</em> - and let that stand as a legacy license that anyone can use. At that point, again, I'm fine with them trying whatever license they want going forward with new content, because the legacy of D&D would be as protected as it can be at that point. WotC's D&D would just be another option among many (it already is, but this would cement that status), and the only people truly harmed by Hasbro's bad decisions would be Hasbro's shareholders.</p><p></p><p>And that's really it. Protect the OGL's intent, and then they can do what they want otherwise.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scars Unseen, post: 8882063, member: 10196"] It depends on the level of "acceptability" we're talking. To avoid a scorched earth, self-harming boycott where I won't even buy material from older editions they have for PoD on DriveThruRPG and trying to convince anyone I ever game with again to do the same? Publicly scrapping 1.1 in total, and a show of intent not to invalidate 1.0a and earlier versions. If they want to make a GSL for 1D&D that only harms the 3pp space around the newest edition, that's their prerogative. To get me to actually consider buying into 1D&D on whatever merits it may or may not possess as a product? They need to first do a [I]full[/I] 180 of intent and fully enshrine the OGL with a new version that [I]closes[/I] any loopholes they thought to exploit in 1.1 that protects all earlier editions of D&D and 3pp created for them - [I]including editions not currently included in the OGL[/I] - and let that stand as a legacy license that anyone can use. At that point, again, I'm fine with them trying whatever license they want going forward with new content, because the legacy of D&D would be as protected as it can be at that point. WotC's D&D would just be another option among many (it already is, but this would cement that status), and the only people truly harmed by Hasbro's bad decisions would be Hasbro's shareholders. And that's really it. Protect the OGL's intent, and then they can do what they want otherwise. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
New OGL - what would be acceptable? (+)
Top