Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dannyalcatraz" data-source="post: 5231039" data-attributes="member: 19675">The guy who is running 4Ed is the newest member of the group, so I don't have a real read on how he likes to run his games.&nbsp; He seems pretty cool, though.But the fact of the matter is this: even though I don't like 4Ed as a DM, and I find certain design decisions to be radically at odds with what I want in D&amp;D, its a good enough game to play, and I'll play anything with good people.&nbsp; And he definitely qualifies.Besides, I figure that if I don't like what is being run, there are 2 solutions: run something else or don't show up.Again, though, I don't think that's going to be a problem.Which is all a long-winded and circuitous way of saying I don't anticipate there being a problem with my PC getting some kind of appropriate gear along the way.&nbsp; The existence of the pact hammer is why I'm using a Warhammer now and why I'll probably have a Maul next level.The thing I'm puzzling over at the moment, though, is what happens if/when he expands the sourcebook list.&nbsp; I'm sure we'll get the other 2 PHBs, so I'm wondering what Magnus Skyhammer would look like as a Hybrid Starlock/Ranger as opposed to a multiclassed one.&nbsp; Since the DM still has my PHBs, I can only speculate, but as I recall, the Hybrid versions of Warlock's Curse and Hunter's Quarry are a bit more limited...I think to class-specific powers/attacks.I've been saying it for some time now: we need a smiley for &quot;getting a fat head&quot;...'cause I'd be using it right now.&nbsp; Thanks for the complement!You ever watch Red Green?The main character often says &quot;If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy.&quot; My modus operandi here is similar:&quot;If other posters don't find you helpful, they should at least find you interesting.&quot; And vice versa.<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dannyalcatraz, post: 5231039, member: 19675"] The guy who is running 4Ed is the newest member of the group, so I don't have a real read on how he likes to run his games. He seems pretty cool, though. But the fact of the matter is this: even though I don't like 4Ed as a DM, and I find certain design decisions to be radically at odds with what I want in D&D, its a good enough game to play, and I'll play [I]anything[/I] with good people. And he definitely qualifies. Besides, I figure that if I don't like what is being run, there are 2 solutions: run something else or don't show up. Again, though, I don't think that's going to be a problem. Which is all a long-winded and circuitous way of saying I don't anticipate there being a problem with my PC getting some kind of appropriate gear along the way. The existence of the pact hammer is why I'm using a Warhammer now and why I'll probably have a Maul next level. The thing I'm puzzling over at the moment, though, is what happens if/when he expands the sourcebook list. I'm sure we'll get the other 2 PHBs, so I'm wondering what Magnus Skyhammer would look like as a Hybrid Starlock/Ranger as opposed to a multiclassed one. Since the DM still has my PHBs, I can only speculate, but as I recall, the Hybrid versions of Warlock's Curse and Hunter's Quarry are a bit more limited...I[I] think [/I]to class-specific powers/attacks. I've been saying it for some time now: we need a smiley for "getting a fat head"...'cause I'd be using it right now. Thanks for the complement! You ever watch [I]Red Green?[/I] The main character often says "If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy." My modus operandi here is similar: "If other posters don't find you helpful, they should at least find you interesting." And vice versa.;) [/QUOTE]

Verification