Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New playtest packet available.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gorgoroth" data-source="post: 6089946" data-attributes="member: 6674889"><p>Fair enough, I concede the points you've all made and apologize for the snark in my tone (don't know what came over me). I am not a hypocrite, however, if Pathfinder allows a huge amount of tricorder-esque scanning (I mean by that, that you don't need to roll to succeed to detect whether something is magical at all, and I still maintain that that's a huge gift towards the PC side of the table), then I disagree with Pathfinder's approach too. </p><p></p><p>However, I've never seen that particular spell or cantrip used nearly so often as arcana, which is basically a swiss army knife for all things magical (traps, detections, dispelling, lore, spellcraft type checks, etc). It's just too many really good uses all rolled up into one, and probably the reason why other editions' frequency never bothered me (including pathfinder), was because the spellcasters had other cool things to do such as cast their spells, i.e. weren't limited to 1 or 2 utility spells per day and weren't spamming the red button (arcana) all the time like I saw in 4e over the years. It gets old after a while. If the first edition ten-foot-pole + listen for noise/detect traps routine was annoying, then 4e had Arcana checks ad nauseum. Again, there was just more variety of stuff to do, both in and out of combat, I found. I'm not saying let's make casters uber powerful, let's just make them have to pick and chose when to know for sure whether there is a magical effect. After playing AD&D for 20 years, it now seems like just another thing they had right before that they mucked up. Probably why there will <em>still </em>be more AD&D players 20 years from now than 4e ones. I just find grittiness and deadliness and difficulty is more central to the experience...and I don't want D&D to mimick the EZ life we have IRL where if you take one feat, suddenly it's like owning an iphone with google maps on it and wikipedia too. Maybe a high level wizard can do that, but you should have to earn those things...a crystal ball or crystal-ball type effect should not be easy to come by, nor common IMO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gorgoroth, post: 6089946, member: 6674889"] Fair enough, I concede the points you've all made and apologize for the snark in my tone (don't know what came over me). I am not a hypocrite, however, if Pathfinder allows a huge amount of tricorder-esque scanning (I mean by that, that you don't need to roll to succeed to detect whether something is magical at all, and I still maintain that that's a huge gift towards the PC side of the table), then I disagree with Pathfinder's approach too. However, I've never seen that particular spell or cantrip used nearly so often as arcana, which is basically a swiss army knife for all things magical (traps, detections, dispelling, lore, spellcraft type checks, etc). It's just too many really good uses all rolled up into one, and probably the reason why other editions' frequency never bothered me (including pathfinder), was because the spellcasters had other cool things to do such as cast their spells, i.e. weren't limited to 1 or 2 utility spells per day and weren't spamming the red button (arcana) all the time like I saw in 4e over the years. It gets old after a while. If the first edition ten-foot-pole + listen for noise/detect traps routine was annoying, then 4e had Arcana checks ad nauseum. Again, there was just more variety of stuff to do, both in and out of combat, I found. I'm not saying let's make casters uber powerful, let's just make them have to pick and chose when to know for sure whether there is a magical effect. After playing AD&D for 20 years, it now seems like just another thing they had right before that they mucked up. Probably why there will [I]still [/I]be more AD&D players 20 years from now than 4e ones. I just find grittiness and deadliness and difficulty is more central to the experience...and I don't want D&D to mimick the EZ life we have IRL where if you take one feat, suddenly it's like owning an iphone with google maps on it and wikipedia too. Maybe a high level wizard can do that, but you should have to earn those things...a crystal ball or crystal-ball type effect should not be easy to come by, nor common IMO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New playtest packet available.
Top