Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Psion update, Dungeons and Dragons Unearthed Arcana
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 9769787" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>Anyone using Bastions? That was 5E24's "experimental" rule system that WotC had never done before.</p><p></p><p>If anyone says they need WotC to be experimental but doesn't actually use the one thing that could satisfy their needs for experiment is a pretty good indication why one's demand for "experimental" design can be ignored. Because odds-are that any other "experimental" thing WotC makes will be another one you'd not use either. Wanting something "experimental" for the sake of it being "experimental" is a pointless request.</p><p></p><p>What any of you actually want is just a ruleset that <em>you yourself want to use </em>(experimental or no). But WotC cannot design for that because they have no idea whatsoever of whatever sort of whackadoo thing every single individual would find useable. I mean take a look over in the non-spellcaster psion thread (in addition to every other psion, warlord, and arcane half-caster thread ever made over these last 11 years)... all kinds of people just throwing random ideas they think they might like but none of which has a definitive design concept. And if someone ever did come up with a definitive design concept, <em>no one would use it</em>. You know how I know? Because we have countless Psions, Warlords, and Arcane Half-Casters up and down DMs Guild and across the internet fully designed by all of you kinds of folks who are throwing out your ideas of what you might want... these designs fully-made, fully-written, ready to be put on the table and played... and none of you are using them.</p><p></p><p>So if you can't even like these 3rd Party designs that go in the types of experimental directions you want... what makes any of you think that WotC could somehow by the grace of god come up with <em>another</em> Psion design in addition to the multiples times they've done them for 5E and you would actually LIKE the result? Most likely what will happen is exactly what has happened with everyone who kept yelling and crying "We need Planesape!" We need Dragonlance!" "We need Spelljammer!" WotC'll eventually give it to you, and you'll come back with "Well, yeah we wanted it... but not like THAT!"</p><p></p><p>And I bet that'd be your precise reactions even if WotC somehow ever created a non-spellcasting Psion too. So why should WotC bother?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 9769787, member: 7006"] Anyone using Bastions? That was 5E24's "experimental" rule system that WotC had never done before. If anyone says they need WotC to be experimental but doesn't actually use the one thing that could satisfy their needs for experiment is a pretty good indication why one's demand for "experimental" design can be ignored. Because odds-are that any other "experimental" thing WotC makes will be another one you'd not use either. Wanting something "experimental" for the sake of it being "experimental" is a pointless request. What any of you actually want is just a ruleset that [I]you yourself want to use [/I](experimental or no). But WotC cannot design for that because they have no idea whatsoever of whatever sort of whackadoo thing every single individual would find useable. I mean take a look over in the non-spellcaster psion thread (in addition to every other psion, warlord, and arcane half-caster thread ever made over these last 11 years)... all kinds of people just throwing random ideas they think they might like but none of which has a definitive design concept. And if someone ever did come up with a definitive design concept, [I]no one would use it[/I]. You know how I know? Because we have countless Psions, Warlords, and Arcane Half-Casters up and down DMs Guild and across the internet fully designed by all of you kinds of folks who are throwing out your ideas of what you might want... these designs fully-made, fully-written, ready to be put on the table and played... and none of you are using them. So if you can't even like these 3rd Party designs that go in the types of experimental directions you want... what makes any of you think that WotC could somehow by the grace of god come up with [I]another[/I] Psion design in addition to the multiples times they've done them for 5E and you would actually LIKE the result? Most likely what will happen is exactly what has happened with everyone who kept yelling and crying "We need Planesape!" We need Dragonlance!" "We need Spelljammer!" WotC'll eventually give it to you, and you'll come back with "Well, yeah we wanted it... but not like THAT!" And I bet that'd be your precise reactions even if WotC somehow ever created a non-spellcasting Psion too. So why should WotC bother? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Psion update, Dungeons and Dragons Unearthed Arcana
Top