Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New Race for critique
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Infiniti2000" data-source="post: 2850659" data-attributes="member: 31734"><p>There's a big difference between a rule like: Speed 30, and "You can't use this weapon." One is governing a mechanic, the other is attempting to govern a character choice of actions. You can't restrict the Stoic from picking up a longsword and using it just by saying "Don't do that." The mechanical penalty people are referring to would be something like the druid's "you lose all class abilities for 24 hours" or some such. In this case, maybe something like, "The Stoic takes a -2 penalty on charisma and wisdom while wielding restricted weapons. This signifies their inner desire to never use such weapons." In this case, the character can still choose to use such weapons, but they generally won't (unless faced with no alternative). I'd extend the restriction to carried weapons.</p><p></p><p> I apologize if this criticism seems harsh, but you seem to really want an honest response. IMO, they seem flat because the general concept is not new and nothing in your writeup is original. The main factor in this perception is the name. Stoic is an adjective and shouldn't be the name of the race. You're assigning a preconceived character concept, complete with desired stats, to the race design. You're not designing a race. I get the feeling from this that you wrote down all the mechanics and then figured out the appearance and name, possibly adding the weapon restriction last. Whether or not this is true does not affect the feeling we get.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Infiniti2000, post: 2850659, member: 31734"] There's a big difference between a rule like: Speed 30, and "You can't use this weapon." One is governing a mechanic, the other is attempting to govern a character choice of actions. You can't restrict the Stoic from picking up a longsword and using it just by saying "Don't do that." The mechanical penalty people are referring to would be something like the druid's "you lose all class abilities for 24 hours" or some such. In this case, maybe something like, "The Stoic takes a -2 penalty on charisma and wisdom while wielding restricted weapons. This signifies their inner desire to never use such weapons." In this case, the character can still choose to use such weapons, but they generally won't (unless faced with no alternative). I'd extend the restriction to carried weapons. I apologize if this criticism seems harsh, but you seem to really want an honest response. IMO, they seem flat because the general concept is not new and nothing in your writeup is original. The main factor in this perception is the name. Stoic is an adjective and shouldn't be the name of the race. You're assigning a preconceived character concept, complete with desired stats, to the race design. You're not designing a race. I get the feeling from this that you wrote down all the mechanics and then figured out the appearance and name, possibly adding the weapon restriction last. Whether or not this is true does not affect the feeling we get. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New Race for critique
Top