Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
new race
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scion" data-source="post: 2335445" data-attributes="member: 5777"><p>The racial skills list is very small, meaning a lack of choice. meaning that the straight psychic warrior is better off (better choices earlier on, even with the same number of points).</p><p></p><p>For the feats, while they have the same total number the 'choices' for those feats is very important. That is why it is apparently ok to give one class 2 feats that are preselected and another 1 feat that they get to choose from a large list.</p><p></p><p>So, the first is close it is definately a 'better' for the psychic warrior.</p><p></p><p>The second is a choice between 3 any feats and 2 from two lists (fighter or psionic) the second is 2 any, 1 from two lists (fighter or psionic) and 2 from the smallest list (psionic only). This cuts into what feat chains you can get and when. Definately a 'better' for the guy with the much larger selection and variety of choices.</p><p></p><p>If you had a class who was given a feat and got to select between 5 feats and a class who was given a feat but only had 2 choices, who would you rate as 'better'? They have the same number sure, but the first is much better in terms of choices. </p><p></p><p></p><p>While I can see how they could be called a wash I dont agree. More choices for amounts to more variety and more potential. They are close, but definately deserving of a 'better'. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Also, I pretty much called the +1damage/-1 to hit a wash, although personally I feel it is a big penalty for the guy who has to make this trade. I'd much rather have the +1 to hit back for that point of damage gone. I think that this one is much closer than the skill points and feats though.</p><p></p><p>Still, in the end, do you feel that each of the builds is roughly equivalent? better in some areas, worse in others, but I dont think dangerously so for any of them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scion, post: 2335445, member: 5777"] The racial skills list is very small, meaning a lack of choice. meaning that the straight psychic warrior is better off (better choices earlier on, even with the same number of points). For the feats, while they have the same total number the 'choices' for those feats is very important. That is why it is apparently ok to give one class 2 feats that are preselected and another 1 feat that they get to choose from a large list. So, the first is close it is definately a 'better' for the psychic warrior. The second is a choice between 3 any feats and 2 from two lists (fighter or psionic) the second is 2 any, 1 from two lists (fighter or psionic) and 2 from the smallest list (psionic only). This cuts into what feat chains you can get and when. Definately a 'better' for the guy with the much larger selection and variety of choices. If you had a class who was given a feat and got to select between 5 feats and a class who was given a feat but only had 2 choices, who would you rate as 'better'? They have the same number sure, but the first is much better in terms of choices. While I can see how they could be called a wash I dont agree. More choices for amounts to more variety and more potential. They are close, but definately deserving of a 'better'. ;) Also, I pretty much called the +1damage/-1 to hit a wash, although personally I feel it is a big penalty for the guy who has to make this trade. I'd much rather have the +1 to hit back for that point of damage gone. I think that this one is much closer than the skill points and feats though. Still, in the end, do you feel that each of the builds is roughly equivalent? better in some areas, worse in others, but I dont think dangerously so for any of them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
new race
Top