Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New Revision Spotlight: Attacks of Opportunity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Petrosian" data-source="post: 881967" data-attributes="member: 1149"><p>IMO that determination as to who you are paying tactical attention to and who you are not should not be determined by outside forces but by personal decision.</p><p></p><p>If my goal is to kill the spellcaster then the fact that he is held should not take him off my radar. It should give me big neon signs saying "gut him now that he is not defeneding" as opposed to gut him slowly later."</p><p></p><p>**********</p><p>a simple example... in case a i want to kill this archer fellow and have backed him into a corner. In case two i want to kill this coffe-table shaped altar and i have backed it into a corner.</p><p></p><p>I should NOT get more swings in a round at an active bowman who has full doidge and Ac against me (up to six **extra** swings in fact) than i do at a coffe table that is not actively defending at all.</p><p></p><p>***********</p><p></p><p>A less simple example...</p><p></p><p>A spellcaster throws a silent teleport within 5' of me. I get an aoo. His defense lapses and i get an opening and i swing. Note that I dont know that he is throwing a spell, i dont see him waving arms, his defense lapses because he is distracted... i see the opening, not the spell.</p><p></p><p></p><p>A held spellcaster stands right by me and i get no Aoo. Maybe i don't see his opening.</p><p></p><p>OK so far! Thems the rules.</p><p></p><p>A held sorcerer standing by me casts a silenced teleport and either...</p><p></p><p>I get an AoO (this is the by the rules.) Somehow his defense went from helpless to worse than helpless and even though he is according to you out-of-sight out-of-mind, i somehow get the AoO.</p><p></p><p>OR some might decide to house rule that his defense cannot drop below helpless and so he does not provoke AoOs by casting while helpless... raising the obvious "can i just decide to stand real still and be treated as helpless so i no longer provoke AoOs for spellcasting?" After all, if helpless prevents AoOs, then he goes helpless, casts silent teleport and gets away from the fighter, never allowing an aoo and never having to make his concentration check.</p><p></p><p>Sound like a trumped up example? We were 5' from it being the case monday night?</p><p></p><p>So, with your no attention paid rationale, wouldn't you be in favor of the latter.the fighter takes his eyes off the sorcerer ***no matter what*** even if the sorcerer had used the silent teleport trick before and thus cannot get an AoO for spellcasting... and so the sorcerer gets away BECAUSE he was held? (of course, given time, the warrior might be able to ready an action to watch for "the opening" the paralyzed mage presents when he casts...)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Petrosian, post: 881967, member: 1149"] IMO that determination as to who you are paying tactical attention to and who you are not should not be determined by outside forces but by personal decision. If my goal is to kill the spellcaster then the fact that he is held should not take him off my radar. It should give me big neon signs saying "gut him now that he is not defeneding" as opposed to gut him slowly later." ********** a simple example... in case a i want to kill this archer fellow and have backed him into a corner. In case two i want to kill this coffe-table shaped altar and i have backed it into a corner. I should NOT get more swings in a round at an active bowman who has full doidge and Ac against me (up to six **extra** swings in fact) than i do at a coffe table that is not actively defending at all. *********** A less simple example... A spellcaster throws a silent teleport within 5' of me. I get an aoo. His defense lapses and i get an opening and i swing. Note that I dont know that he is throwing a spell, i dont see him waving arms, his defense lapses because he is distracted... i see the opening, not the spell. A held spellcaster stands right by me and i get no Aoo. Maybe i don't see his opening. OK so far! Thems the rules. A held sorcerer standing by me casts a silenced teleport and either... I get an AoO (this is the by the rules.) Somehow his defense went from helpless to worse than helpless and even though he is according to you out-of-sight out-of-mind, i somehow get the AoO. OR some might decide to house rule that his defense cannot drop below helpless and so he does not provoke AoOs by casting while helpless... raising the obvious "can i just decide to stand real still and be treated as helpless so i no longer provoke AoOs for spellcasting?" After all, if helpless prevents AoOs, then he goes helpless, casts silent teleport and gets away from the fighter, never allowing an aoo and never having to make his concentration check. Sound like a trumped up example? We were 5' from it being the case monday night? So, with your no attention paid rationale, wouldn't you be in favor of the latter.the fighter takes his eyes off the sorcerer ***no matter what*** even if the sorcerer had used the silent teleport trick before and thus cannot get an AoO for spellcasting... and so the sorcerer gets away BECAUSE he was held? (of course, given time, the warrior might be able to ready an action to watch for "the opening" the paralyzed mage presents when he casts...) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New Revision Spotlight: Attacks of Opportunity
Top