Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Rule of Three is up for 31 Jan. 2014
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rhenny" data-source="post: 6255283" data-attributes="member: 18333"><p>I used to like giving each player control over every situation by allowing him or her to roll to perceive depending on if the PC is in position (through movement or marching order) to have a chance to see/hear a hidden foe or a trap. But after thinking about Passive Perception for a while I think there is definitely merrit to comparing 1 foe roll to the passive perception scores of each of the party memebers especially when it comes to determining surprise.</p><p></p><p>Player rolls example: the group is walking past a stack of boxes. The fighter is leading them, his shield is glowing with divine light provided by the party cleric. As soon as the fighter steps within 10' of the boxes he makes his wisdom(perception) check vs. predetermined DC 15 (or whatever...it could even be 10+proficiency+attribute bonus+expertise if the hidden creature has NPC class). </p><p></p><p>Now...here's the problem. What if 8 creatures are hiding, and the fighter fails the perception check? That would probably allow all 8 of the creatures to pounce on the fighter and rip him to shreds. When would the others in the group get to perceive/act? Would we roll intiative after 1 creature attacks? Or would we let all 8 attack before rolling initiative? How does surprise work if the others don't make wisdom (perception checks)? Do we make all of the others roll a wisdome (perception check)? Are the others automatically surprised? Is only the fighter surprised and everyone rolls for initiative to see who acts first (even the ones that didn't make a perception check)?</p><p></p><p>Considering these quesitons....maybe the passive roll is best. With one roll, it will be much easier to determine who is surprised and who isn't. Roll for foes -- then see if fighter has high enough passive perception....then check against each of the others in the party. Have the group roll for initiative and begin the combat letting those who are not surprised act in the first round. This may be the most efficient way to do it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rhenny, post: 6255283, member: 18333"] I used to like giving each player control over every situation by allowing him or her to roll to perceive depending on if the PC is in position (through movement or marching order) to have a chance to see/hear a hidden foe or a trap. But after thinking about Passive Perception for a while I think there is definitely merrit to comparing 1 foe roll to the passive perception scores of each of the party memebers especially when it comes to determining surprise. Player rolls example: the group is walking past a stack of boxes. The fighter is leading them, his shield is glowing with divine light provided by the party cleric. As soon as the fighter steps within 10' of the boxes he makes his wisdom(perception) check vs. predetermined DC 15 (or whatever...it could even be 10+proficiency+attribute bonus+expertise if the hidden creature has NPC class). Now...here's the problem. What if 8 creatures are hiding, and the fighter fails the perception check? That would probably allow all 8 of the creatures to pounce on the fighter and rip him to shreds. When would the others in the group get to perceive/act? Would we roll intiative after 1 creature attacks? Or would we let all 8 attack before rolling initiative? How does surprise work if the others don't make wisdom (perception checks)? Do we make all of the others roll a wisdome (perception check)? Are the others automatically surprised? Is only the fighter surprised and everyone rolls for initiative to see who acts first (even the ones that didn't make a perception check)? Considering these quesitons....maybe the passive roll is best. With one roll, it will be much easier to determine who is surprised and who isn't. Roll for foes -- then see if fighter has high enough passive perception....then check against each of the others in the party. Have the group roll for initiative and begin the combat letting those who are not surprised act in the first round. This may be the most efficient way to do it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Rule of Three is up for 31 Jan. 2014
Top