Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Sage Advice: Class Features, Combat, Spells, & Monsters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="iserith" data-source="post: 7676268" data-attributes="member: 97077"><p>I've been at it for over 25 years now. In addition to my regular groups, I've had the pleasure of running pickup games for hundreds of players on Roll20 (if my stats are accurate).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>During my time playing D&D and other RPGs, I have encountered players like the ones you describe. But every single one of them was a reasonable person when, as a player or DM, I spoke to them about the goals of play which, as you say, have been around for a very long time. Once the goals of the group are aligned, players can indeed create "the most powerful character they can" and <em>still</em> make choices that help the group achieve the goals of play. I didn't need to "put my foot down." I didn't need more rules or rules clarifications. I just needed to assume the best of them and speak to them on a person-to-person level and seek their buy-in, then watch with pride as they rose to the occasion. I've seen the pixie trick in my game - once - and it was <em>awesome</em>. It led to an incredibly fun scene and the introduction of a whole fey subplot in the campaign. After that point, the player never used it again because he made a decision that while it was a powerful gimmick, it wouldn't be fun for everyone and wouldn't lead to exciting, memorable stories to use it all the time. In my last campaign, two of the players decided that their characters had to die because that was what would make for the best story at that moment. We "won" D&D by the definition of winning in the Basic Rules, in part, because of their choices.</p><p></p><p>If the players and DM don't agree on what it means to "win" or "lose" D&D, then perhaps it is inevitable to see the abuse that so many people have mentioned in this thread and others. But it's spelled out right in the rules for all to see, discuss, and agree upon. Perhaps a discussion is in order for such groups rather than more rules or rules clarifications. It has worked for me and maybe it will work for others. And I hope it does - not having to be on guard for player abuse makes it a lot easier and more fun to run the game for me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="iserith, post: 7676268, member: 97077"] I've been at it for over 25 years now. In addition to my regular groups, I've had the pleasure of running pickup games for hundreds of players on Roll20 (if my stats are accurate). During my time playing D&D and other RPGs, I have encountered players like the ones you describe. But every single one of them was a reasonable person when, as a player or DM, I spoke to them about the goals of play which, as you say, have been around for a very long time. Once the goals of the group are aligned, players can indeed create "the most powerful character they can" and [I]still[/I] make choices that help the group achieve the goals of play. I didn't need to "put my foot down." I didn't need more rules or rules clarifications. I just needed to assume the best of them and speak to them on a person-to-person level and seek their buy-in, then watch with pride as they rose to the occasion. I've seen the pixie trick in my game - once - and it was [I]awesome[/I]. It led to an incredibly fun scene and the introduction of a whole fey subplot in the campaign. After that point, the player never used it again because he made a decision that while it was a powerful gimmick, it wouldn't be fun for everyone and wouldn't lead to exciting, memorable stories to use it all the time. In my last campaign, two of the players decided that their characters had to die because that was what would make for the best story at that moment. We "won" D&D by the definition of winning in the Basic Rules, in part, because of their choices. If the players and DM don't agree on what it means to "win" or "lose" D&D, then perhaps it is inevitable to see the abuse that so many people have mentioned in this thread and others. But it's spelled out right in the rules for all to see, discuss, and agree upon. Perhaps a discussion is in order for such groups rather than more rules or rules clarifications. It has worked for me and maybe it will work for others. And I hope it does - not having to be on guard for player abuse makes it a lot easier and more fun to run the game for me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Sage Advice: Class Features, Combat, Spells, & Monsters
Top