Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New stealth rules.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9424378" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>No, the intent is clear. </p><p></p><p>These rules are not meant for a PC to stand in an empty room, and roll stealth twenty-five times until they get over a 15 and then stroll out of the room, completely invisible to everyone in the entire city. Firstly, the rules of the game do not allow the PC to declare a check, the DM determines when a check is warranted due to uncertainty in the situation. Additionally, the game has NEVER really supported "just keep re-rolling until you succeed" </p><p></p><p>So that scenario is not the intent of the rules. </p><p></p><p>What about if you are in the woods, and you hide behind a bush, and sneak up to a bandit camp? Well, no player, ever, without specifically trying to make a point about this thread in particular, would ever say "okay, I want to step out of the bush, and disco dance in front of the scout, since I'm invisible and the scout can't see me". <strong><u>No one</u></strong> would think that is a reasonable action, if they were not insisting that that is exactly how they interpret these rules. Everyone agrees that is absurd. </p><p></p><p>The reason that the rules do not say that breaking cover doesn't break the condition granted from hiding, is because that was how things used to work, which meant that if a character run from the bush to a tree, then the rules technically meant they were automatically spotted. Also, it meant that the player couldn't say "I wait until he turns around, then rush out and stab him" because the second they moved from their cover, they lost all benefits of being hidden. Now, they can do this clearly obvious thing that hiding should allow them to do.</p><p></p><p>So, when we stop saying "well, what is actually written allows..." and instead look at "what would a player, in good faith, attempt to do?" then the rules intent is crystal clear, and these rules work. They actually work really well. Better than the old rules. The designers just made the stupid decision to only consider good faith play.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9424378, member: 6801228"] No, the intent is clear. These rules are not meant for a PC to stand in an empty room, and roll stealth twenty-five times until they get over a 15 and then stroll out of the room, completely invisible to everyone in the entire city. Firstly, the rules of the game do not allow the PC to declare a check, the DM determines when a check is warranted due to uncertainty in the situation. Additionally, the game has NEVER really supported "just keep re-rolling until you succeed" So that scenario is not the intent of the rules. What about if you are in the woods, and you hide behind a bush, and sneak up to a bandit camp? Well, no player, ever, without specifically trying to make a point about this thread in particular, would ever say "okay, I want to step out of the bush, and disco dance in front of the scout, since I'm invisible and the scout can't see me". [B][U]No one[/U][/B] would think that is a reasonable action, if they were not insisting that that is exactly how they interpret these rules. Everyone agrees that is absurd. The reason that the rules do not say that breaking cover doesn't break the condition granted from hiding, is because that was how things used to work, which meant that if a character run from the bush to a tree, then the rules technically meant they were automatically spotted. Also, it meant that the player couldn't say "I wait until he turns around, then rush out and stab him" because the second they moved from their cover, they lost all benefits of being hidden. Now, they can do this clearly obvious thing that hiding should allow them to do. So, when we stop saying "well, what is actually written allows..." and instead look at "what would a player, in good faith, attempt to do?" then the rules intent is crystal clear, and these rules work. They actually work really well. Better than the old rules. The designers just made the stupid decision to only consider good faith play. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New stealth rules.
Top