Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Thommy H-H" data-source="post: 9424391" data-attributes="member: 6797019">And it does require some rewiring of your brain. Multiple people in this thread have challenged me on saying that the Invisible condition says nothing about not actually being visible in the way that most of us understand it, as if I personally don't know what the word means. This isn't coming from me, guys: I'm just interpreting the rules as I understand them! WOTC used a common word with a common definition to mean something slightly different, and I saw (I believe) what they were going for and am trying to explain how I think it is intended to work. Honestly, my advice to anyone interested in making these rules work and not just complain about how they make no sense, is to substitute all references to the Invisible condition for a different word of your choice in your head. Then try running through various scenarios and see if they're more palatable.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Thommy H-H, post: 9424391, member: 6797019"] And it does require some rewiring of your brain. Multiple people in this thread have challenged me on saying that the Invisible condition says nothing about not actually being visible in the way that most of us understand it, as if I personally don't know what the word means. This isn't coming from me, guys: I'm just interpreting the rules as I understand them! WOTC used a common word with a common definition to mean something slightly different, and I saw (I believe) what they were going for and am trying to explain how I think it is intended to work. Honestly, my advice to anyone interested in making these rules work and not just complain about how they make no sense, is to substitute all references to the Invisible condition for a different word of your choice in your head. Then try running through various scenarios and see if they're more palatable. [/QUOTE]

Verification