Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New stealth rules.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kinematics" data-source="post: 9425226" data-attributes="member: 6932123"><p>Looking at the text of the Invisible condition again, I see that the "can somehow see you" phrase helps in the framing of hiding vs spells, where being hidden may or may not, at any given point in time, mean an enemy can actually see you. (IE: This is separate from using See Invisible to "somehow" see you).</p><p></p><p>Basically, if we accept that the Invisible condition is retained even when you're in the open (for example, hiding in a crowd), the ability to target you based on sight does not have to involve having found you. If you are hidden in a crowd, the guard may not have found you, and can't identify you in particular, but there are spells that target people in an area that you can see — and despite being "Invisible", you can still be physically seen, and thus affected by such a spell, even if only due to randomly picking people out of the crowd.</p><p></p><p>This lends weight to the consideration that the Invisible condition can still apply even when you can be physically seen. At the same time, hiding can also be done such that you <em>can't</em> be physically seen, in which case you can't be targeted.</p><p></p><p>Basically, having the Invisible condition granted through Hiding means you may or may not be physically seen at any given time, and this can change from moment to moment. The "can somehow see you" phrasing means you have to evaluate whether you can be physically (or via some alternate sense) seen for the purpose of certain actions.</p><p></p><p>However, that <em>also</em> applies to the third section, where you may or may not get advantage on attack rolls (or disadvantage attack rolls against you) based on whether you can somehow be seen.</p><p></p><p>So, going back to the guard at the gate scenario: If you walk up to him while having the Invisible condition, you are still physically visible, which means he can "somehow see you". That means you do not get the benefits on attack rolls or being targeted by spells, though you retain the advantage on initiative. On the other hand, if you snuck up behind him (or walked past him and then turned around and attacked from behind), he would <em>not</em> see you, and you regain those roll advantages and targeting restrictions.</p><p></p><p>Being Invisible in that scenario is the "don't notice me" type of invisibility, which meshes with the "awareness" aspect that I detailed in my post about "find".</p><p></p><p>It also means that the See Invisible spell <em>doesn't matter</em> with respect to the Invisibility granted by Hiding. You'd still need line of sight to see someone, and if you have line of sight, the Invisible (Hidden) target can "somehow be seen", so adding See Invisible on top of that doesn't change anything. See Invisible just makes it so that you can somehow be seen regardless of secondary effects which may prevent that, such as the transparency effect of the Invisibility spell, but not things like total cover.</p><p></p><p>It's taken a bit to really fit everything together, but it's really making sense now, as written.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kinematics, post: 9425226, member: 6932123"] Looking at the text of the Invisible condition again, I see that the "can somehow see you" phrase helps in the framing of hiding vs spells, where being hidden may or may not, at any given point in time, mean an enemy can actually see you. (IE: This is separate from using See Invisible to "somehow" see you). Basically, if we accept that the Invisible condition is retained even when you're in the open (for example, hiding in a crowd), the ability to target you based on sight does not have to involve having found you. If you are hidden in a crowd, the guard may not have found you, and can't identify you in particular, but there are spells that target people in an area that you can see — and despite being "Invisible", you can still be physically seen, and thus affected by such a spell, even if only due to randomly picking people out of the crowd. This lends weight to the consideration that the Invisible condition can still apply even when you can be physically seen. At the same time, hiding can also be done such that you [i]can't[/i] be physically seen, in which case you can't be targeted. Basically, having the Invisible condition granted through Hiding means you may or may not be physically seen at any given time, and this can change from moment to moment. The "can somehow see you" phrasing means you have to evaluate whether you can be physically (or via some alternate sense) seen for the purpose of certain actions. However, that [i]also[/i] applies to the third section, where you may or may not get advantage on attack rolls (or disadvantage attack rolls against you) based on whether you can somehow be seen. So, going back to the guard at the gate scenario: If you walk up to him while having the Invisible condition, you are still physically visible, which means he can "somehow see you". That means you do not get the benefits on attack rolls or being targeted by spells, though you retain the advantage on initiative. On the other hand, if you snuck up behind him (or walked past him and then turned around and attacked from behind), he would [i]not[/i] see you, and you regain those roll advantages and targeting restrictions. Being Invisible in that scenario is the "don't notice me" type of invisibility, which meshes with the "awareness" aspect that I detailed in my post about "find". It also means that the See Invisible spell [i]doesn't matter[/i] with respect to the Invisibility granted by Hiding. You'd still need line of sight to see someone, and if you have line of sight, the Invisible (Hidden) target can "somehow be seen", so adding See Invisible on top of that doesn't change anything. See Invisible just makes it so that you can somehow be seen regardless of secondary effects which may prevent that, such as the transparency effect of the Invisibility spell, but not things like total cover. It's taken a bit to really fit everything together, but it's really making sense now, as written. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New stealth rules.
Top