Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New stealth rules.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9425342" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>It is pretty simple in my mind. Whether or not the text explicitly states it in 100% unambigious clear language... if you don't have the conditions needed to hide, you are no longer invisible. Rushing from cover into a pitch black room? Okay, you are still invisible. Crawling on the ceiling behind someone who doesn't turn around and look up? Okay, you are still invisible. </p><p></p><p>The spell says you have the condition. Period. No other conditions needed to maintain it, except the spell remains active. </p><p></p><p>And, technically, this can be supported in the rules. Hiding stops working if a creature (referred to an an enemy) finds you, the invisibility condition does not end this way, it only loses the benefits against a creature that can somehow see you. If you stop interpreting that as requiring a search action only, and instead look at it as requiring a perception check, then this falls together. Every skill check in 5e (and this is still 5e and these rules are still in the book) is only rolled if the outcome is uncertain. If the outcome is not uncertain, then a roll is not needed because the check automatically succeeds or fails. </p><p></p><p>You immediately fail an athletics check to jump to the moon. You immediately succeed a perception check to see someone standing in an empty hallway directly in front of you. </p><p></p><p>Why doesn't this work for invisibility the spell? Because it doesn't need any other conditions to function. It just grants you the status of not being seen. Yes, nothing states that the spell makes you translucent, but we know that is the intent, and that it is also still flexible enough to cover other thematically appropriate versions of invisibility, such as a psychic shroud or being covered in wind spirits. Because at the end of the day</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]375285[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Whether it is from cover or being translucent, the invisible condition looks the same to an observer. The only difference is, if you stop trying to hide, the enemy can find you without any real effort, because you have stopped attempting to hide from them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9425342, member: 6801228"] It is pretty simple in my mind. Whether or not the text explicitly states it in 100% unambigious clear language... if you don't have the conditions needed to hide, you are no longer invisible. Rushing from cover into a pitch black room? Okay, you are still invisible. Crawling on the ceiling behind someone who doesn't turn around and look up? Okay, you are still invisible. The spell says you have the condition. Period. No other conditions needed to maintain it, except the spell remains active. And, technically, this can be supported in the rules. Hiding stops working if a creature (referred to an an enemy) finds you, the invisibility condition does not end this way, it only loses the benefits against a creature that can somehow see you. If you stop interpreting that as requiring a search action only, and instead look at it as requiring a perception check, then this falls together. Every skill check in 5e (and this is still 5e and these rules are still in the book) is only rolled if the outcome is uncertain. If the outcome is not uncertain, then a roll is not needed because the check automatically succeeds or fails. You immediately fail an athletics check to jump to the moon. You immediately succeed a perception check to see someone standing in an empty hallway directly in front of you. Why doesn't this work for invisibility the spell? Because it doesn't need any other conditions to function. It just grants you the status of not being seen. Yes, nothing states that the spell makes you translucent, but we know that is the intent, and that it is also still flexible enough to cover other thematically appropriate versions of invisibility, such as a psychic shroud or being covered in wind spirits. Because at the end of the day [ATTACH type="full"]375285[/ATTACH] Whether it is from cover or being translucent, the invisible condition looks the same to an observer. The only difference is, if you stop trying to hide, the enemy can find you without any real effort, because you have stopped attempting to hide from them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New stealth rules.
Top