Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Crimson Longinus" data-source="post: 9430604" data-attributes="member: 7025508">I see. I mean this is a super niche corner case situation that is unlikely come up at all, so not at all comparable to the basic functionality of the hide rule. But if you insist, we could interpret the rule representing some sort of an adrenaline rush, and the fighter could psych themselves up by hitting the wall. Though it would also be a reasonable houserule that this sort of adrenaline rush requires an actual enemy in actual combat to occur, and such ruling would not affect the normal functionality of the rule. 'Perhaps they could just write some of these &quot;obvious things&quot; into the rulebooks which are supposed to tell us how to play the game, no?Also, in a combat lasting for several rounds, you would not let a character attempt to hide again if they failed a hide roll on an earlier round? Because to me such a ruling is far from obvious.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Crimson Longinus, post: 9430604, member: 7025508"] I see. I mean this is a super niche corner case situation that is unlikely come up at all, so not at all comparable to the basic functionality of the hide rule. But if you insist, we could interpret the rule representing some sort of an adrenaline rush, and the fighter could psych themselves up by hitting the wall. Though it would also be a reasonable houserule that this sort of adrenaline rush requires an actual enemy in actual combat to occur, and such ruling would not affect the normal functionality of the rule. ' Perhaps they could just write some of these "obvious things" into the rulebooks which are supposed to tell us how to play the game, no? Also, in a combat lasting for several rounds, you would not let a character attempt to hide again if they failed a hide roll on an earlier round? Because to me such a ruling is far from obvious. [/QUOTE]

Verification