Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New stealth stuff from WotC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="clearstream" data-source="post: 4406207" data-attributes="member: 71699"><p>You might recall the question went in just prior to the Compendium entry being unearthed. I can't know the precise timing, but it seems likely the ruling was only in regard to PHB Stealth.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>To me it's a matter of balance. Passive means the Rogue's skill nearly invariably works, against many enemies not even failing on a 1. I would personally restrict rolling to alert enemies, because I feel that if those guys are effectively spending actions in their own turns to keep a look out, a passive check makes no sense at all. I'm not trying to reopen this argument: you have excellent reasons for your view and were it relevant I may have come to change my mind.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I absolutely agree with you. If the CSR was addressing his response toward the Compendium version, then his response was flatly wrong. However, I feel we have good grounds to believe his response was addressed toward post-FAQ PHB Stealth. If as you suspect the Compendium entry is not yet official, that again supports this view.</p><p> </p><p>-vk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="clearstream, post: 4406207, member: 71699"] You might recall the question went in just prior to the Compendium entry being unearthed. I can't know the precise timing, but it seems likely the ruling was only in regard to PHB Stealth. To me it's a matter of balance. Passive means the Rogue's skill nearly invariably works, against many enemies not even failing on a 1. I would personally restrict rolling to alert enemies, because I feel that if those guys are effectively spending actions in their own turns to keep a look out, a passive check makes no sense at all. I'm not trying to reopen this argument: you have excellent reasons for your view and were it relevant I may have come to change my mind. I absolutely agree with you. If the CSR was addressing his response toward the Compendium version, then his response was flatly wrong. However, I feel we have good grounds to believe his response was addressed toward post-FAQ PHB Stealth. If as you suspect the Compendium entry is not yet official, that again supports this view. -vk [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New stealth stuff from WotC
Top